Paul Reubens, Eternally Pee-wee Herman, Dead at 70

Andrew Donaldson

Born and raised in West Virginia, Andrew has been the Managing Editor of Ordinary Times since 2018, is a widely published opinion writer, and appears in media, radio, and occasionally as a talking head on TV. He can usually be found misspelling/misusing words on Twitter@four4thefire. Andrew is the host of Heard Tell podcast. Subscribe to Andrew'sHeard Tell Substack for free here:

Related Post Roulette

1 Response

  1. DavidTC says:

    It’s worth pointing out that almost all the charges against Rueben were basically because he was gay.

    The indecent exposure thing was due to the police going undercover at a gay porn theater, which, in case anyone is confused, would have been literally one of the only places to see gay porn in 1991, and it was assumed pretty much everyone was masturbating there, that was the point of being there, so it seems really absurd to charge anyone with indecent exposure for that.

    He also denies he actually was masturbating, and it does appear the police just sorta randomly arrested people there.

    And at some point you have to ask yourself yourself why the police were sending undercover agents to sit in gay porn theaters to try to find people masturbating, and not the other porn theaters. Wait, no you don’t, it’s 1991, open discrimination against gay people is perfectly normal.

    As for the child porn stuff…Rueben collected vintage stuff, and often ordered by lots, and the police raided him on a tip that seems to have been mostly untrue.

    A small portion of his stuff shows underaged boys without clothes…but in magazines that were openly produced as nudist magazines and stuff. None of it depicts minors having sex or even overtly sexual, and it’s worth pointing out he has a _huge_ collection of this sort of vintage stuff, with a tiny fraction of it nudity and even smaller amount minors. We’re talking about thousand of images and ‘physique magazines’ (Aka, things gay men bought before gay porn was legal), along with just vintage stuff, and a maybe a dozen images of nude people in the magazines who might be minors, all of which he bought mostly sight unseen, and don’t actually appear to be sexual at all. This is just the sort of thing that happens if you buy a _lot_ of old stuff.

    The DA actually looked at it and didn’t prosecute, he was prosecuted by a city attorney.

    Also, the police, somehow, ‘accidentally’, confused another taped they’d gotten from somewhere else as part of his evidence, a tape that depicted teen boys having sex, and leaked that fact to the press, until his lawyer was able to prove it wasn’t part of his evidence. Weird, that. Wonder how that could have happened. So odd.

    Basically, what is going on here is that Paul Rueben got caught up in at least two targeted sweeps against gay men, and ending up having to plea to two lesser deals in an attempt to keep from having to go on trial as a gay man. Because him being outed as a gay man in 1991 or even 2004 would have likely ruined his career. And, yes, it sounds completely absurd that pleading guilty to minor sex crimes was better than being outed as gay, but that was the world back then.Report