Sunday Morning! “Butcher’s Crossing” by John Williams
“I expect from this journey a rebirth and a spiritual baptism. I sense so many deep and great possibilities within myself and up to now I have realized so little.”
So wrote Mikhail Bakunin to his friend Alexander Herzen in 1839; he was hoping to borrow some money to travel to Germany and away from the stifling atmosphere of Tsarist Russia. At the time, Bakunin was also hoping to become a university professor, however his encounters in Berlin with the Young Hegelians and various socialists pointed him in a different revolutionary path. But, if his earlier, more respectable intentions were dashed, well, the destructive urge is also a creative urge.
It occurs to me that Bakunin’s expectations were met, and the journey was indeed a catalyst that set him on a new path and unlocked his potential. It also occurs to me that everything feels that way at that age- every monent is a door that we might step through and start on a whole new path. Certainly, all of us felt as if our young possibilities were coiled and sleeping in the darkness and ready to strike- kept in a state of suspended animation in the glacial mass of our days. This is the dream of Romanticism: that we will escape social selfhood long enough to do the great work of our lives- to become most fully ourselves. That we will set off on some great adventure, at least once, and find out who we could be.
And, it’s strange too, because I feel myself on the cusp of a great journey myself, for the second time in my life (at least), and with all the doubts of middle age, but somehow still anticipating a “rebirth” and a “spiritual baptism.” And so, the question arises what if every moment throughout our life really is that way- as loaded with potential and any other moment- and the only thing that really differs is our degree of awareness and strength of will. A frightening thought, isn’t it?
Now, Bakunin was an anarchist and more concerned than most with the social forces that prevent chunks of the population from ever having any hope of self-actualization. And it does seem that one problem is our journey of development is so often caught up and confused with “making a living,” being a financial success, and just with raw necessities. The trouble is there’s no numerical value wherein one is officially a “success,” and even if there were, other people would still be doing better!
And, then finally, when society yokes self-realization to notions of success, it creates a problem around how we should deal with failure, something that’s far more common in human life. It’s one of my little pet theories that post-Christian societies don’t really have the cultural resources to process failure; we’re expected to brush ourselves off and not bother others about it, which creates a cultural void and a crisis. It’s no real surprise to me that the great American art form of the 20th century, noir fiction, comes out of the “victories” of World War II, in which evil was realized on earth and then everyone was required to move on and make a living for themselves. Failure still waits, coiled up in the darkness beside our possibilities.
Which at long last brings me to the book in question: Butcher’s Crossing by John Williams! Williams spent the war years enlisted in the Air Force in Calcutta; when he returned, he had sustained physical and psychological injuries that stayed with him for the rest of his life; he also had the pages of a first novel, Nothing but the Night, about a young man in crisis. Williams later disowned this short novel, but his later works Stoner and Butcher’s Crossing are also about young men trying to find a purpose in life to sustain them through the injuries of fate. In the end, simply surviving is success.
In Butcher’s Crossing, the young man, William Andrews, is on a quest out of American mythology: with the words of Ralph Waldo Emerson in his mind, he leaves Harvard behind and heads out West to find his life’s purpose in the sublime of nature. Like last week’s book, Nothing the Same, Everything Haunted, Williams is drawing on the cowboy legend in this novel with a more cynical and world-weary tone than is typical. The transcendentalists might have sought an experience beyond embodied selfhood; but real cowboys got their hands a lot bloodier.
Andrews is looking for the real thing when he arrives in Butcher’s Crossing, Kansas, a town awaiting its own salvation through hunting and ranching and the impending apotheosis of the railroad. He tracks down a family friend who offers him a job trading buffalo hides, but the young man wants the full western experience of going along with a team of skilled men on a buffalo hunt. He contracts a seasoned hunter and outdoorsman named Miller to lead the crew, which will consist of Andrews, a pious, alcoholic wagon-driver named Charlie Hoge, and a skinner named Fred Schneider. Miller knows of a hidden valley off an abandoned trail where the buffalo are rumored to migrate each year. The young man will put up the money for the trip, and in return, they will bring back enough hides to get rich and Andrews will find out what kind of man he might become.
But the novel hews, I think, more closely to noir fiction than the Western: it’s a classic can’t-miss money-making scheme that goes awry due to men’s moral failings. They find the buffalo, as promised, and they start in with the killing, only to find that Miller can’t let up when the season’s running late. In a chilling passage, we realize it’s not about “bloodlust” for him, or even greed; it’s about asserting his will through this one destructive act of mastery. He has to cull the herd entirely, or not at all.
But then, as if by an act of God, the snows come and the group has lingered too long. They will have to dig in and survive the winter with the limited supplies they have. Williams was an experienced outdoorsman and these passages are filled with harrowing and granular detail. It is a a survival tale to rival Shackleton’s own doomed voyage. On one level, this is simply a cracking good story. The group triumphs over death (for the most part), and Andrews learns what he is made of, but there is no great victory to be had here. In the end, the few remaining dregs at the bottom of the cup are bitter. The railroad has moved on; the rising tide sinks most boats. Failure is the common experience.
John Williams’s own literary triumphs came a little too late. After decades of neglect, and nearly twenty years after the author’s own death, his college novel Stoner was rediscovered and hailed as a great lost masterpiece. Butcher’s Crossing has followed behind, and has been called one of the greatest Westerns ever written. I’d actually consider it the superior novel; nothing feels superfluous or out-of-place, the prose is pitch-perfect, and the story lingers in the mind long after reading it. (I actually read it months ago and am just writing on it now.) Now, that it has been rediscovered, we can look forward (?) to a film adaptation starring, inevitably, Nicolas Cage as the driven hunter Miller.
But, the underlying question posed by the novel- do we become oursleves more fully in failure or success?– is one that only life can answer, and that takes years and years.
So, until then, what are YOU reading, writing, pondering, playing, watching, or testing yourself with this weekend?
In a weird bit of synchronicity, I just saw a short rant explaining how Marx would never have imagined Tankies in a million years, Bakunin would have. This resulted in me spending 10 minutes on Bakunin’s wikipedia page.
Wacky.
This part here is really good:
I’ve been thinking about one of Richard Selzer’s essays. He’s a doctor who has treated many people including an archaeologist who just got back from Guatemala. Dude came back and had an abscess on his arm. In getting ready to clean out the abscess, he quickly discovers that it’s actually a botfly and goes through the moral horror and revulsion of finding a botfly tunneled into a man and:
Of course, it’s quickly hammered out that it’s just a botfly and it was going to come out by itself and it would have died pretty quickly.
He then writes “I tried to save the world, but it didn’t work out.”
I think that we live in a world where the breadth of our vision is freakin’ *HUGE* but we really don’t have a whole bunch more power than our ancestors did. So our vision has the scope of the world and so our moral vision is imagined to have the same scope and so our failures are similarly gigantic.
When if we had the worm’s eye view that would probably be more appropriate to our power levels, we’d probably be the same amount of failures as always, but might actually achieve something that even we would consider a victory every now and again.
As it is, our vision tells us we have to save the world.
But that probably won’t work out.
Anyway, I just saw a trailer for a movie that is, erm, “Die Hard in an Active School Shooter Situation”. Half of me was morally disgusted and the other half was disappointed to find that it came and went already and is not yet being streamed. Bummer. I kinda want to see that.Report
Yeah, I don’t really agree with much of anything in Bakunin, although I find a lot worth reading in Kropotkin. Probably my favorite anarchist, if I had to pick, would be Leo Tolstoy. But, that’s a whole other kettle of fish.
I still have a morbig curiosity about this movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NbqAcDDnb1Q
But, do I want to pay to watch it?….
Also, I saw this website and thought “This year, the trick-or-treaters are getting whatever the hell they ask for!”
https://wee1tactical.com/Report
I’ve read Stoner and Butcher’s Crossing and adored both. Both are probably woefully out of fashion right now. A lot of would-be academics would lie, steal, cheat, and kill for a career like Stoner’s. In the novel, he is supposed to be something of a failure despite marrying the daughter of the University President. Still, he has a career dedicated to the life of the mind and tenure and a house and things. The whole affair with the grad student episode would be considered in poor form today probably.Report
Yeah, there’s an interview with Williams (which you’ve probably seen because I think it’s at the end of the book) where he says he really didn’t consider it a sad story at all because Stoner was able to devote his life to the thing he loved, so his various failures were not so important. I think there was a generation that found it much easier to become academics than it is now, and I’m not sure they realize it.Report
Easier but not easy. Plenty of people did ABD 40-50 years ago because they realized academia would mean moving to middle of nowhere schools and decided no than you to that.Report
It could also be that the internet makes it easy to find publish more tales of woe for adjuncts but I think the number of adjuncts has increased.Report
In terms of reading, I am making my way through Cathedral by Ben Hopkins, it is a massive novel about the a Cathedral town in Alsance and the various tides and fortunes and changes over the centuries it takes to build the Cathedral. It reminds me of Hesse’s Narcissus and Goldmund in many ways.
I watched the first episode of Severance last night. I am not sure what to think. The basic concept is that there is a mysterious and ominous corporation called Lumen in an area that looks like Upstate New York. Some of Lumen’s employees undergo a procedure called Severance where there work lives and personal lives are separated. From the hours of 9 to 5, employees lose all knowledge and ability to access any information about their personal lives. Are they married? Do they have kids? Where did they go on Holiday? It is all gone. At the end of the day, they go up an elevator and all the memories return. The main protagonist is a history professor widower who signed up for the job out of the psychological balm of being able to forget he is a widower for 8 hours a day. Of course, complications arise.
Critics seem to love the show as a critique of life-work balance and the corporate world and late capitalism but I am not sure. The outside world is the present day, iphones and all. The world of the corporation looks like it comes from the 1960s and uses old computer terminals that look very 1970s and 80s. Many critics seem to make statements like such: “Work Mark has no idea what his life is like outside the office; home Mark has not even the faintest inkling of what he does for a living. Dream scenario? Not so fast. Mark’s company, Lumon Industries, has essentially taken over part of his brain. For that part of himself, work is now an experience that he can’t leave.”
I don’t get this view. The people leave at the end of the day. If they were placed in stasis or something when not working that would be different.Report
I gotta say Cathedral sounds pretty interesting- I hadn’t even heard of it. I did watch Mr. Klein because you mentioned it and thought it was excellent, but a little bewildering because so much feels unresolved, although I think that was intentional.Report
How does Lumon get people into the office if they forget they have a job after they leave? A lot of critiques of modern work life fail because they basically can’t and won’t go full Marxist. This is because they are ultimately written by people who want a world that basically looks like the one we know but kindler and gentler. They really can’t and do not want to imagine anything in life being that radically different. Basically combine the heyday of the post-WWII economic order in the West but with 21st century things and liberal mores. The number of them that want something more radical is really limited. This makes many of the critiques weak because the writers don’t want to imagine a world without corporations.Report
People don’t seem to forget they have a job. They know they are severed. It is discussed on the outside. What severance means is that when you are at work, you forget about your outside life. You can’t remember if you had a family or what you did on the weekend. When you leave work, you can’t remember what you did that day at work. Though the work being done by the protagonists is very enigmatic. They look at old fashioned little computer terminals. The terminals display numbers. They are supposed to find the data/numbers that look/feel scary and move it to a bin. I think this is suppose to be an example of being alienated from your labor.Report
Basically, I think the critics love of this kind of reveals how much they do not know about normal office life.Report
I’m reading the Book of Jacob by Olga Tocarzuck. It is a panoramic novel of early to mid-18th century Poland the Jewish apikoreth Jacob Frank and his followers.Report