The commenter archive features may be temporarily disabled at times.
Search
TEN SECOND BUZZ
- The FTC has banned (nearly all) non-compete agreementsApril 23, 202418 Comments
- More Campus Palestine Protests, More Arrests, More Viral VideoApril 23, 202417 Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 4/22/2024April 22, 202440 Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024April 15, 2024232 Comments
- OJ Simpson: Football Great, Murder Suspect, and Convicted Felon, Dead at 76April 11, 2024115 Comments
Features
Hot Posts
A Message From Devcat
We have been experiencing some system resource issues. We believe the problem may be resolved, but if it is not please bear with us.
Recent Comments
- LeeEsq on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassOne of the things that I don't understand from Pro-Palestinian Westerners is how they keep on insist…
- Dark Matter in reply to LeeEsq on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassThink of all the bricks that get thrown at BLM. The theory of building a minority organization is di…
- Dark Matter in reply to DavidTC on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassWhen I read the wiki on the alleged sex crimes during the attack we seem to have a large volume of c…
- Dark Matter in reply to DavidTC on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassOne of the issues with "subtract the situation" is "everything we know could be wrong". So for examp…
- LeeEsq in reply to Jaybird on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassThe time frame is more complicated. Even after the Six Day War, it was seen as a larger Israel-Arab…
- Jaybird in reply to LeeEsq on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassIf you haven't seen this, you should. It's only a few seconds and it's really a treat. (Note: You sh…
- Jaybird in reply to LeeEsq on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassThe underdog status ended after the Six Day War over there. It's wobbly over here but there are stil…
- LeeEsq in reply to Jaybird on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassI also expect that the period where Jews were seen as an underdog was short and not entirely univers…
- Michael Cain in reply to North on The Shifting Politics of AbortionThe two big stories of political geography in the US over the last 30 years is the huge swing from b…
- LeeEsq in reply to Chip Daniels on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassAnd what really pisses me off isn't necessarily the anti-Zionism per se but just treating Jews as di…
Comics
-
April 24, 2024
-
April 23, 2024
-
Friend Husband At The Ballpark
April 22, 2024
-
Good Morning! Are You An Amateur?
April 21, 2024
More Comments
- LeeEsq in reply to Jaybird on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- North in reply to Michael Cain on The Shifting Politics of Abortion
- Dark Matter in reply to DavidTC on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- Jaybird in reply to LeeEsq on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- Chip Daniels in reply to LeeEsq on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- LeeEsq in reply to Chip Daniels on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- Michael Cain in reply to North on The Shifting Politics of Abortion
- Chip Daniels in reply to LeeEsq on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- Dark Matter in reply to DavidTC on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- North in reply to Michael Cain on The Shifting Politics of Abortion
- Dark Matter in reply to LeeEsq on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- Michael Cain in reply to Chip Daniels on The Shifting Politics of Abortion
- LeeEsq in reply to Chip Daniels on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- LeeEsq in reply to Saul Degraw on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- Chip Daniels in reply to Michael Cain on The Shifting Politics of Abortion
On “Barry Goldwater, Paul Ryan, and… Me”
Somebody tell The Atlantic that we're "The League of Ordinary Gentlemen," not a comedy series on FX. Other than that, nice article!
On “Presidential Debate LeagueCast”
Guys, this was fucking awesome.
On “American Ambassador To Libya Killed”
MICHELLE WAS RIGHT:
http://www.politico.com/blogs/politicolive/1011/Bachmann_Libya_still_a_mistake.html
Just sayin'
On “Friday Night Jukebox: Fight Test”
Nice pick, Kuz.
On “Bullygate”
Portrait of a sadist:
http://campaign2012.washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/romney-mr-nice-guy/537521
On “Romney the prankster, Obama the politician”
Here's another one:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jan/30/chain-email/viral-internet-story-says-mitt-romney-helped-locat/
"
Thanks, Pat. I'm sure you could selectively highlight other biographical tidbits to make Romney look like Nelson Mandela. For example:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/the-heroic-romney-rescue-that-for-some-reason-th
"
Burt, is this supposed to be tongue-in-cheek? If a complete stranger evaluated my character based on high school assholery and behavior during road trips, it's a fair bet I'd come off as a total psychopath, too.
On “Leaguefest 2012: Reservations Still Available”
Pics or it didn't happen!
On “Portlandia in Portland, The Enders Game in South Carolina, and Why I Prefer Living In A Nation Over a Confederacy”
Tod, did you catch the Weekly Standard's cover story on Portland? I'd be curious to read your take:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/insufferable-portland_631919.html
On a mostly unrelated note, got any tips for visiting Portland on a budget?
On ““The Space Traders””
Exit question: If the current electorate was actually presented with Bell's bargain, what would the results look like? Would the Wilder Effect be enhanced or diminished? And would we survive the aftermath of the election, even if a majority voted against the bargain?
"
Thanks, Tod. I don't think I have the energy to start posting on a regular basis again, but I like hanging around in the comments section.
On “Random Musings: Songs About Texas Edition”
COSIGN THE MOTHERFUCKING GASLIGHT ANTHEM LOVE. Gawd I <3 that band. Like the Bouncing Souls and Springsteen had a baby.
On “At My Real Job: DNA and the Death Penalty”
Although my response to Will Truman was inapt: I didn't mean to say that criminal defendants aren't constitutionally entitled to jury trials. I just think professional juries would satisfy that constitutional requirement.
"
Err, would*
"
I don't understand why the text of the Sixth Amendment was preclude professional juries.
"
Sounds about right to me, James.
Will, I think every defendant has a right to due process, but that doesn't necessarily entail trial by jury. If professional jurors are fairer and more effective, I don't see why your rights would be violated by having them adjudicate your trial.
"
I'm surprised no one has ever seriously proposed the professionalization of jury service.The idea of being judged by one's peers has a certain romantic appeal, but I'd rather be judged by people familiar with criminal law and basic forensic science. I suppose there's a possibility that professional jurors would be influenced by the same institutional mindset that creates overzealous prosecutors, but I think you could create a separate organization that instills an adversarial, truth-seeking ethos.
Alternatively, we could require high schools students to take jury duty seminars or institute some sort of national service program for basic jury training.
"
This is a sweet topic, but I'm really fiending for a Coming Apart symposium. Think you guys will get to that in the near future?
On “Koch v. Cato – Some Further Thoughts”
John Hinderaker? Dear Lord.
I can't speak for everyone involved, but I've always thought Cato Unbound was an important inspiration for the League's model: Get a bunch of smart folks who disagree about an important issue in a room together and watch them go at it (civilly, of course). We're not exactly a buttoned-up policy journal, but the underlying principles are close enough. Anyway, Cato Unbound's lively existence is a credit to the mothership, and I'd hate to see you all lose that freewheeling intellectual environment.
Besides, is DC really starving for another conservative attack dog? As it stands, Cato seems to fill a pretty unique (and valuable) niche.
On “Friday Jukebox”
Add another 10 points to your result on Murray's quiz.
On “No Points for Thinking of Richard Branson”
I think folks may be misunderstanding the reasoning behind Murray's approach. I read his decision to exclude other ethnic groups as a way to reduce the number of external variables that could complicate his analysis. The white middle class he refers to doesn't have the historical/cultural baggage of other groups, so its social pathologies can't be attributed to outside factors like the legacy of discrimination/segregation etc
"
Could you persuade Murray to do a Cato Unbound symposium? Here's the question I'm interested in: Did these changes occur because of the welfare state, consumer capitalism, the decline of high-paying blue collar jobs, or some other factor(s)?
"
To be fair, this site attracts the sort of weirdos who would skew the results. And I mean that in the best way possible.
"
Right, because WASP connotes a specific ethno-religious background (White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. The new elites aren't tied to a particular geographic or ethnic group - they're defined by shared cultural norms.
*Comment archive for non-registered commenters assembled by email address as provided.