Properly understood, carried interest is a return on capital. Dave brings a unique perspective to the carried interest debate.
While Dave does not expect to change hearts and minds when it comes to privatizing municipal assets, he hopes to provide some clarity by addressing critiques pertaining to the economics of those transactions.
Here, Dave presents the historically-evidence for a strict construction reading of the Constitution. This Part II of II.
In the first of two posts, Dave tries to make the argument that a proper understanding of the Constitution’s structure points to strict construction as the proper way to interpret the document.
…or something like that… This piece of news caught my attention:
Dave challenges Cass Sustein’s claim that Richard Epstein’s legal theories serve as the intellectual framework for the Tea Party.