Cancel This Entire Season of National Anthem Ball
The morning began well enough, but there was an intrusion, and ripple in the Twitter continuum as it were. I was informed by the hive mind of social media that I am now expected to have a strong reaction to owner Mark Cuban directing the Dallas Mavericks NBA team to cease playing the national anthem.
I did not, other than a semi-joking tweet with the “Uh-huh, that’s bait” GIF from Fury Road and a quip about having seen this movie, agreeing with our friend Tod Kelly that the fact nobody noticed until now was telling, and later a lament that I was tired of National Anthem ball.
Sure enough, by mid-afternoon, ducking that particular ball of hot cultural mess proved out to be the correct decision since the original story didn’t even make it past lunchtime on the west coast.
Now we know why Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban didn’t want to bring attention to his decision to stop playing the national anthem before home games this season.
Days after Cuban’s decision started receiving national attention — but months after it was actually put into practice — the NBA issued a statement Wednesday saying all teams would stick with the tradition of playing the anthem before tipoff.
“With NBA teams now in the process of welcoming fans back into their arenas, all teams will play the national anthem in keeping with longstanding league policy,” NBA chief communications officer Mike Bass said in the statement.
The Mavericks had indicated earlier this week that they had no plans to start playing the anthem again, but Cuban told the New York Times of the NBA’s mandate: “We are good with it.”
Cuban defended the rights of players and coaches to kneel during the anthem before games in the Florida bubble last year. In a since-deleted tweet from July, Cuban wrote: “The National Anthem Police in this country are out of control. If you want to complain, complain to your boss and ask why they don’t play the National Anthem every day before you start work.”
He told the New York Times earlier this week that he determined that the anthem would not be played before games at American Airlines Center in 2020-21, starting with the preseason.
“It was my decision, and I made it in November,” Cuban said without any elaboration.
According to the Athletic, the organization didn’t publicize the decision and did not announce it internally. It wasn’t until Monday, when a limited number of fans were allowed to attend a Mavericks home game for the first time this season, that the absence of the anthem received widespread attention.
Recall, if you will, that it was the NBA suspending their season with afflicted players testing positive for Covid that was the first real cultural shockwave that foretold 2020 and the pandemic being like nothing we had seen in our lifetimes. Baseball soon followed, along with other sporting events either suspending or canceling their seasons. The NBA did finally get their season finished in “the bubble” of a Disney World encampment, and are slowly starting to let fans back into buildings this season. College football similarly had starts and stops on their way to playing, and the biggest sport of them all in America, the NFL, just finished a complete if irregular season with a limited audience for the Super Bowl.
The sports leagues canceled their seasons to stop a dangerous virus. Therefore, it would be all together appropriate for us to cancel another season of a sort of sport to stop another virus: This latest season of National Anthem Ball must be cancelled immediately.
I’ve just frankly had enough online rage debate over the National Anthem, the Pledge of Allegiance, the Flag of the United States of America, or whatever other symbolism you want to put forth. This is not the first, and I doubt the last time, I will have to write about such things. I do understand the passion, though, I really do. Each of those things mean a great deal to me, things that I would have trouble fully explaining in words, things that I could easily express in anger or worse if I didn’t keep my own bearing and emotions in check. But that is beside the point; those are my feelings, my emotions, my attachment and connection. Not everyone has those same feelings, emotions, and connections to the symbols of our country. They don’t have to. That doesn’t make them less American, or less patriotic, or anything else other than different.
We are fickle about which sacraments of our civic religion are unbreakable, and when not observing them is/isn’t an unpardonable sin. Along with being older than sliced bread, Betty White is also 9 years older than the Star-Spangled Banner being the Official National Anthem of the United States of America. You might want to sit down for this one, but Bellamy — an avowed socialist at the time, by the way — wrote what became the Pledge of Allegiance as a PR stunt, and indeed went into advertising in later life. Until WW2 it was done with the “Bellamy Salute” which had to be axed since it was indistinguishable from what is now universally known as the Nazi Salute. Oh, and the “Under God” part didn’t make it into the pledge until a 1954 act of congress.
The Flag of the United States has been more constant in the 240 plus years of America. The Star-Spangled Banner, the banner, has changed with the addition of states, but even as the original venerated symbol of America it isn’t the Ark of the Covenant, striking everyone dead that dares touch it when unclean and unworthy. Waving it at something, or decorating an event, or a person wearing it as a vestment doesn’t make anything more patriotic, or more American, or more whatever you want to claim it does. Putting the flag on a casket, transfer case, or folded beside the remains of someone is a different matter, but that isn’t what the interwebs are doing here, no matter how much they would like to make it so.
Nor does burning Nikes for your social media followers to marvel and coo at your patriotically puritanism extending from your kicks poulaine-style. Nor does the playing or not playing of the National Anthem. Nor does fussing about athletes who kneel disrespecting the country, or the National Anthem, or veterans, or whatever else. Those who insist it does have their own lives giving testimony to what a lie that is since they are nowhere to be found protesting, burning, or fussing at how actual veterans are treated by the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System their own tax dollars pay for. “He/they/it disrespected the vets!!!!” person cannot be bothered to pay any attention to those same vets when it won’t get them noticed to do so. After all, actually doing something for those who bore the burden of battle for all those freedoms that get sloganeered by the poser patriots of social media is messy, complicated, thankless work. Who wants to do that when there are games to watch? Not to mention the equally daunting task of addressing issues of race, social justice, and other matters those athletes are protesting and seeking change for. Just wave the flag at them until they get out of the way of enjoying our game, dang them.
So, yes, when social media demanded we scratch their itch of National Anthem outrage at Mark Cuban, the Dallas Mavericks, the NBA, and whoever else, my immediate reaction was to pass. We’ve seen this movie. We know it has nothing to do with actual patriotism but rather the passions of the moment and the furthering of well-honed priors and continuations of long-running grievances. It’s not really patriotic furor, but self-righteous inertia, of lacking a better way of contending in the arena of ideas when the world isn’t going your way. By the afternoon, Mark Cuban had publicly complied with the NBA mandate to play the anthem before games. No doubt the next stage will be a return of the kneeling debate. I’ll probably pass on that too. It’s a rerun, after all, and we all should know where we are at on that issue by now.
If folks insist on continuing this season of National Anthem Ball the way we have the last few, that is their right to do it. But I don’t have to watch it, or participate in it, or pretend that the whole posing mess is anything other than what it is. And I won’t. No matter how much you try to wave the flag at me about it. .
Do other countries typically play their own national anthem before games? I don’t mean international competitions… I mean their in-country equivalents of the NBA/MLB/NFL/etc.
The more I think about it, the odder it seems.Report
Canada certainly does.Report
I found myself wondering “Do they play the national anthem before soccer games in Europe?”
And… they don’t.
Part of that makes sense because if Spain is playing Portugal, whose anthem do you play? Both of them? AIN’T NOBODY GOT TIME FOR THAT. (Though I understand that there was a problem there for a while where German fans would sing “Deutschland, Deutschland Uber Alles” at the opposing teams.)
But playing the National Anthem before a game is something that seems to only happen in the US and Canada.
This article here talks about how the Star Spangled Banner was a huge hit during WWI at ball games and how it started getting played before a ball game on the regular right after WWII ended.
Grandparents, man. They didn’t understand how bad they were. They thought they were good.Report
See… playing it during an international competition would seem to make MORE sense.
“Hey, we got the US playing Canada. All the Americans are going wild for their boys as their anthem plays!”
But instead it’s… “Okay, we got Chicago vs Detroit. Both teams have players from the US, Canada, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, and Australia. LET’S HERE THE ANTHEM OF THE GOOD OL’ US-OF-A!”
Also, when an American team plays a Canadian team in a US-based league (think Boston Red Sox vs Toronto Blue Jays or New York Rangers vs Montreal Canadiens), they typically DO play both country’s anthems. Hell, they might even play both even when two Canadien teams are playing (E.g., Toronto Maple Leafs vs Winnipeg Jets). I could be wrong on that last point.Report
In Europe a hundred miles is a long way. In America a hundred years is a long time.
All that to say, Europe has a long history of, shall we say, “international competition”. Playing the national anthem would do a good job of picking at old scabs rather than providing a brief moment of fun nationalist fervor.
You know what they should do? They should play the EU Anthem.
Joy, beautiful sparkle of the gods,
Daughter of Elysium!
We enter, fire-drunk,
Heavenly one, your shrine.
Your magic again binds
What custom has firmly parted.
All men become brothers
Where your tender wing lingers.Report
When a Canadian baseball team plays an American one, they play both anthems. (Ours definitely suffers by comparison.)Report
One of the few good memories of deploying to MIssissippi for Hurricane Katrina response/relief was the Canadian combat engineers sent to the county I was working in. I had to drive past their encampment every AM on the way to our field office, and they were always there at sun up, beat a$$ red with sunburns, Saluting the Maple Leaf as the listened to both O Canada and God Save the Queen.Report
We could replace singing the anthem with something else patriots do, like hunting Nancy Pelosi.Report
This is the flip side of what the kids are calling “cancel culture”, which is the enforced displays of patriotism and sometimes piety.Report
Astute observationReport
Agreed. Which goes back to the whole Kapernick kneeling non-controversy . . .Report
That holds, I think.
I remember when I was in the Navy how much we all kinda chaffed at the enforced displays. I mean, we all understood why we stood at attention, and saluted the flag and officers, etc. while in Uniform. But out of uniform, it was mostly just annoying, and you wouldn’t bother except in very specific circumstances (read: it was something that I wanted to show respect for).Report
The farther down I got in this piece, the more I wonder whether you’re tired of debating the national anthem at sporting events, or you’re just tired with people disagreeing with you. Because those are two very different things.Report
If I were to make an argument for the National Anthem, it’d probably revolve around something like:
1. Sports are a sublimation of War
2. A common tradition before this sublimation of War reminding everybody that we’re all on the same side is a good thing
3. A National Anthem is about as anodyne as we’re going to get.
Now, of course, people might want to point out that THIS PARTICULAR Anthem is bad and we should instead have a different unifying ceremony prior to sublimating war.
Okay. Sure. Whadya got?Report
Why can’t each team pick their own pre-game song?Report
Hrm. Put the focus on “before every game, the home team plays the chosen song of the visiting team! Well, a censored version of it, anyway. So, tonight, the LA Lakers are hosting the Utah Jazz and so we’re all going to rise and sing ‘What I Got’ by Sublime. But not the part about playing the guitar.”
That could work. Change songs every year.
Deal with people asking questions about whether there are any regrets for Seattle choosing their particular song five years ago now that the Marilyn Manson allegations have surfaced.Report
I think I like the idea of One Song that Unites Us All more, though.
It doesn’t have to be a National Anthem.
It can be an NBA Anthem.Report
Technically team owners own a franchise in the league. Lots of rules about how they have to operate their franchise. Failure to comply is punished, up to and including losing your franchise (some years back the owner of the then San Diego Clippers was required to sell his franchise). One of the goals of “the league office” is to ensure some uniformity of the experience. It appears that in the NBA, part of the uniformity is the Star Spangled Banner slotted into the pre-game sequence.
The NFL used to play the Star Spangled Banner at games before the teams came out of the locker rooms and it was irregularly shown on TV. This changed when the DoD offered money and color guards if the league would play the anthem after the players were on the field, which in turn required the networks to show it.Report
I don’t understand the argument here. We know that people perform these civic ceremonies (the Pledge, the Anthem, et cetera) with the intention of showing respect for the country. We’ve heard people who protest during these ceremonies state that they’re showing disrespect for the country. When Kaepernick said, “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color”, he wasn’t indicating displeasure with the flag, he was indicating it with the country.
Now, Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t participate in these ceremonies because they disagree with the ceremonies themselves, not with the country these ceremonies are identified with. But people who disrespectfully burn the flag aren’t angry at the flag. We have to be honest here – they’re taking ceremonial actions that all of us recognize as speech.
It doesn’t matter how old the Pledge is. If someone put a cork in the middle of the room and said “now this represents our country”, and someone else spit on it, we’d know what they meant. You can argue that the freedom to symbolically denounce the country is one of the tenets of our national ethic, and that’s true. But the act of symbolically denouncing the country has to be seen first and foremost as a denunciation of the country, and only indirectly a praising of the rights on which the country was founded, unless the act is specified as such. I mean, doesn’t it? This is in the realm of “honest, honey, I was just giving her a breast exam”. I just checked Wikipedia for the Texas v. Johnson case, and the crowd was reported shouting “America, the red, white, and blue, we spit on you, you stand for plunder, you will go under”. That’s all flag-as-symbol.Report
Gotta say, all this preening about American rights and values is strange hear coming from someone who’s been an apologist for a political party which just tried to violently overthrow the government to keep Trump in power.Report
I’m fine with my record of statements about Trump. Can you respond to the position I’ve laid out on this topic? If you can, please do. If you can’t, I’d have to figure that you only care about badgering me until I apologize or leave. And that means I’ll never, ever stop commenting here. Anyway, let’s face it, if this site is too overwhelmingly conservative for you, you’re not going to be happy with any opposing commenters.Report
Thanks for the offer, Pnky, but I’m fine with what I wrote above being my total response to your comment.Report
You’re ok with not being able to discuss the topic of the thread? Yikes.
Are you ok with leaving the impression of badgering? I wouldn’t be. I mean, it’s very hard to read your comment and believe you care about free speech. Or am I misreading you? Would you care to explain?Report
Republicans, on the other hand, love the country so much they’re ready to use violence to get control of it back. “Honest, honey, I only hit you because I care so much”.
Report
Its ok to assassinate the Vice President, so long as you wave a flag while doing it.
That just common sense.Report
I will remind you that violence created this country. Otherwise, you’d be in the Commonwealth of Nations.
So, we’ve already decided that violence is acceptable. The question is “when” is it time to use this tool. What matters is who wins. If the “rebels” win, it was justified. If the rebels lose, they were traitors.Report
It’s like Goldwater said, “Extremism in defense of a piece of shit’s pathetic lies is no vice.”Report
Doesn’t the right ever get tired of virtue-signaling?Report
There’s a lot of vice-signaling too. E.g. people who know better refusing to admit that Biden won fair and square.Report
Displeasure =\= disrespect. But sneaky move there!
There is no use arguing against your point because it is an unfounded one and begs too many questions to count.
ETA: Kaep not proud of the country’s oppression of BIPOC = Kaep displeased with the nation = Kaep disrespecting the nation = Kaep spitting on the flag
There’s no use discussing such obvious and intentional twisting of reality.Report
“Displeasure =\= disrespect.”
Remember that thing where some dude photoshopped the CNN logo into the video of Trump’s appearance on WWF, and Trump said “lol”, and this was seen as a violent act of personal aggression against journalists?Report
I try not to use the same words over and over again. It’s a habit I fall into as a programmer, repeating formulas. So I switched “disrespect” and “displeasure”. But I only did it once, and I have no problem saying that Kaepernick showed both to the flag.
And again, Kaepernick is the one showing disrespect, by his own words. ““I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color.” If he said he was protesting against oppression in America, that’d be one thing, but he said he was judging the country on its oppression. We can argue about whether “disrespect” and “displeasure” are fitting terms to describe his position, but my point stands in response to Andrew’s article: that the acts aren’t merely pointed at the ceremony but at the country.Report
So what, exactly, is the problem with someone expressing displeasure, or showing disrespect, to the country?
Does that act cause you real harm in some way?Report
I’m addressing the implication of Andrew’s statement that “not everyone has those same feelings, emotions, and connections to the symbols of our country.” That statement, followed by descriptions of the newness of various symbols, implies that the feelings toward the symbols doesn’t reflect the feelings toward the country. I acknowledge that in some cases the feelings toward the symbols are different from the feelings toward the country, but in Kaepernick’s case they aren’t.
That doesn’t necessarily represent a problem. I’m not sure the drunken sports fans who cheer through the final lines of The Star-Spangled Banner are presenting great patriotism either. My point is merely that, in the absence of contrary evidence, we should take people’s symbolic speech at their “word”.Report
Cuban should just troll Silver by showing a video of Roseanne Barr singing the anthem.Report
Just as fans are starting to be able to come to games, drive them out?Report