Ordinary World: Holiday Hangover Edition
[OW1] The “People’s Court” in China is not a made-for-TV show
A Chinese court on Monday sentenced a former lawyer who reported on the early stage of the coronavirus outbreak to four years in prison on charges of “picking fights and provoking trouble,” one of her lawyers said. The Pudong New Area People’s Court in the financial hub of Shanghai gave the sentence to Zhang Zhan following accusations she spread false information, gave interviews to foreign media, disrupted public order and “maliciously manipulated” the outbreak.
Lawyer Zhang Keke confirmed the sentence but said it was “inconvenient” to provide details – usually an indication that the court has issued a partial gag order. He said the court didn’t ask Zhang whether she would appeal, nor did she indicate whether she would. Zhang, 37, traveled to Wuhan in February and posted on various social media platforms about the outbreak that is believed to have emerged in the central Chinese city late last year.
[OW2] Meanwhile, in Russia…
A blizzard of recent legislation in the State Duma has made it harder to protest, easier to target opposition figures and activists and has given authorities broad scope to brand individuals as “foreign agents,” with five-year jail penalties for failure to meet reporting requirements. The government is also moving to curb foreign Internet sites such as Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.
Under new laws, Putin has immunity from prosecution for life, and information about the financial and personal affairs of millions of members of Russian intelligence bodies, security agencies, the judiciary, law enforcement, regulatory agencies and the military — and their relatives — is classified. This elite, central to Putin’s power, has been targeted for corruption investigations by Alexei Navalny, Russia’s main opposition figure and Putin’s only political rival. Some of the new laws appear aimed at him and his colleagues at his Anti-Corruption Foundation.
“It’s a captured state. Putin is forever. He will not step down,” said Vladislav Inozemtsev, a political analyst with the Moscow-based Center for Post-Industrial Studies and an associate with the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “If you’re staying another 15 or 20 years in the Kremlin, you should tighten everything, because protests are definitely not declining. And therefore this turn to authoritarianism was absolutely obvious, and it will go further and further.”
[OW3] Let them fight?
Last month, lawyers acting on behalf of the Boy Scouts asked a judge to throw out the lawsuit, which suggested it could not use “scouts” or “scouting” in its recruitment material for girls.
In the latest filing at the Manhattan federal court on Christmas Eve, the Girl Scouts described the new recruitment programme as “highly damaging” to its organisation, having caused an “explosion of confusion” among parents.
“As a result of Boy Scouts’ infringement… [there have been] rampant instances of confusion and mistaken instances of association between Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts,” the papers stated, adding that the organisation could provide proof of such instances.
In a statement released on Saturday, the Boy Scouts said this was “not only inaccurate – with no legally admissible instance of this offered to date in the case – but it is also dismissive of the decisions of more than 120,000 girls and young women who have joined Cub Scouts or Scouts BSA”.
[OW4] One last campaign hurrah?
President Trump announced Sunday that he’ll hold a rally in Georgia on the eve of a crucial Senate run-off — and will be in the nation’s capital when Congress votes to certify the electoral vote.
“On behalf of two GREAT Senators, @sendavidperdue & KLoeffler, I will be going to Georgia on Monday night, January 4th, to have a big and wonderful RALLY,” he said on Twitter. “So important for our country that they win!”
That would put him in the state one day before GOP incumbent senators David Purdue and Kelly Loeffler are facing a run-off election, with Republican control of the Senate hanging in the balance.
Democrats Jon Ossoff and the Rev. Raphael Warnock are vying to eliminate the GOP’s two-seat majority in the legislative chamber.
The two have raised more than $200 million between them — by far the most in a Senate race this year. More than 2 million Georgians have cast early votes in the race.
[OW5] How much relief is in the relief bill?
This latest bipartisan relief package omits direct state and local aid, and it only extends federal unemployment benefits to mid-March, even though millions of people probably will be out of work for far longer. Overall, the bill’s price tag shrank from $2 trillion to below $1 trillion, a product of a legislative compromise that was forged between Democrats and Republicans, who were weary of adding to the nation’s debt load.
Here’s what’s in the new $900 billion stimulus package
“This is better than nothing, and there’s some good news that we’re finally getting a deal,” said Kathy Bostjancic, chief U.S. financial market economist at Oxford Economics. “The bad news is it’s less stimulative than the prior packages, and the relief measures are short-lived.”
Still, many of the 14 economists interviewed by The Washington Post said the package should be large enough to prevent the economy from backsliding further in the coming months. By that time, vaccines should be more widespread, enabling the hard-hit restaurant and travel sectors to begin a robust recovery.
[OW6] This is refreshing from a professional athlete
WATCH:@JJWatt goes on an explosive rant about the state of the team.
Watt is upset at the product the Texans are putting on the field for the fans: pic.twitter.com/VFDB34rhUs
— Ari Alexander (@KPRC2Ari) December 27, 2020
[OW7] Here we go again…
Britain will ban “buy one get one free” promotions for food high in fat, sugar or salt and free refills of sugary soft drinks in restaurants from April 2022, the government said on Monday, its latest step in its plan to tackle obesity and improve public health.
The government says obesity is one of Britain’s biggest long-term public health problems with almost two-thirds of adults in England overweight and one in three children leaving primary school overweight or obese.
The measures will also restrict where in a store promotions on such products can be advertised, and unhealthy promotions will not be allowed at checkouts, shop entrances or at the ends of aisles.
“We are restricting promotions and introducing a range of measures to make sure the healthy choice is the easy choice. Creating an environment which helps everyone eat healthier foods more regularly is crucial to improving the health of the nation,” public health minister Jo Churchill said.
[OW8] The Yelp! reviews at the end were straight fire…
Archaeologists in Pompeii, the city buried in a volcanic eruption in 79 AD, have made the extraordinary find of a frescoed hot food and drinks shop that served up the ancient equivalent of street food to Roman passersby.
Known as a termopolium, Latin for hot drinks counter, the shop was discovered in the archaeological park’s Regio V site, which is not yet open the public, and unveiled on Saturday.
Traces of nearly 2,000-year-old food were found in some of the deep terra cotta jars containing hot food which the shop keeper lowered into a counter with circular holes.
[OW9] App of the year?
We no longer live in a 2D meme world of Pepe the Frog, the boyfriend checking out another woman and that man with the weird crinkly face laughing at things. The realm of visual online artistry now not only demands PhotoShop, but video editing skills. Many argue that Vine did this first, but the caveat here is that Vine died while TikTok, which was the fastest app in the history of social media to reach a billion user downloads, isn’t going anywhere. Creators like Robert Tolppi have sent eerie, bad 3D renderings viral on DeepTok [Deep TikTok], the TikTok community known for promulgating a number of bizarre videos, the comments sections of which users gather in to revel in their internet weirdness. This is the year that the internet got “deepfried”: a phrase that refers to the use of deliberate glitches and creepy voice deepening effects that turned TikTok feeds into a sort of Orwellian doomscape. But for fun. Given how much the rest of the world felt like it was turning into an actual Orwellian doomscape, it makes sense that kids would want to create their own one, within their control, and within which they could connect. Many of the deep-fried videos failed to reach virality outside of the app unlike many other TikToks this year, suggesting that the odder niches of meme culture only work when partnered with TikTok’s mysterious algorithm, much like how others only work in certain groups or subreddits.
[OW10] Making free speech permanent during Covid?
Unsure whether he could hold a funeral for his grandmother who succumbed to COVID-19, the man turned to Tiffany Mitchell for another way to memorialize her.
He “couldn’t just get the phone call and go, ‘OK, she’s dead’ and just leave it at that and do nothing at all,” said Mitchell, who owns Black Raven Tattoo in Torrance. “For a lot of people, a tattoo is one of the only outlets they have to honor somebody.”
With a whirring tattoo gun, she emblazoned the words “Grandma RIP” on his forearm.
This was during a brief window beginning in October, when Los Angeles County tattoo parlors opened after being shuttered for the second time by coronavirus restrictions. A state order that went into effect earlier this month brought about a third wave of closures across most of California.
Mitchell and two other Southern California tattoo parlor owners have sued Gov. Gavin Newsom over the mandated closures. On Wednesday, a federal judge denied their request to temporarily lift the restrictions.
For public health purposes, the state lumps tattoo parlors into the personal care services category that includes nail salons and barbers — all requiring prolonged, close contact with clients.
But unlike nail and hair styling, tattoos are considered a form of constitutionally protected free speech in some jurisdictions
China and Russia are offering us a valuable real time lesson in how authoritarianism gains and consolidates power.
Neither of course was ever free in the Western sense of the word, but in recent decades were much more free than they are now.
In each case, freedom wasn’t taken in the Hollywood version of goosestepping troops and cataclysmic invasion. Instead it was a long series of slowly encroaching bites, establishing a favored elite with a powerful vested interest in self-protection, and legal system designed to protect but not bind, and bind but not protect.
What’s noteworthy for me, is that these regimes are popular, and the authoritarianism is backed by what might be a minority, but a large enough one that it can install and defend the regime.
Also noteworthy is the lack of drama and violence. If you walk down the street of Moscow or Beijing, you won’t see piles of corpses, no secret police kicking in doors.Report
China and Russia also show that soft authoritarian governments can’t resist the temptation to go hard authoritarian. So as democracy dissolves into soft authoritarianism you are going to eventually get hard authoritarianism.Report
The nicest thing I could say is we’re currently debating the flavor of our authoritarianism.
But you’re delusional if you think this is a problem peculiar to the right.
In fact, the meanest thing I can say is that the Left is much further along and in a much better position to impose their flavor… the dissolving that Lee mentions is the solvent of technocratic liberalism that has the broad minority support of ‘all the right people’ and will impose a benevolent authoritarianism that we’ll all agree is just right. How else could we not?
Among the bad things Trump has ushered in will be the constant whirl of “well, Trump did it” and “we’re not doing what Trump did, that was bad… we’re doing this, and this is good.” In my ongoing One Ring analogy… we’re not embarking on the hopeless mission of destroying the ring, we’re going to use it for good!Report
This. Everyone thinks their flavor of authoritarianism is for the betterment of society in some flavor of decline.
But in the end, it’s just a question of who has the power, and who is under the boot heel.Report
This is entirely true for the reason that freedom and tyranny don’t have precisely defined edges.
What is freedom or license, or what is tyranny or order are largely a matter of general consensus not objective metrics.
But like the argument of the beard, its easy to turn this into a fallacy where freedom and tyranny are merely arbitrary matters of opinion.Report
Trump is the most authoritarian president we’ve ever had, by far. He is enormously popular among his party members, far more than anyone is among Democrats. and they’re largely encouraging him to be more dictatorial, e.g. to retain the presidency be whatever means are necessary. Among those are many members of federal and state government. So you’ll forgive me if I take that more seriously than I do the powerless fringe that call themselves The Squad.Report
Trump is Yeltsin/Berlusconi levels of Authoritarian… that’s not a good level, but we’re getting about as much danger as those figures entail. Stylistically Trump is like Yeltsin – incompetent and buffoonish – but unlike post-Yeltsin, I don’t think the US is institutionally as weak, so Trump doesn’t usher in a Putin… Unfortunately Trump doesn’t have the good grace to drink himself to death, so we’ll have to endure his post-Presidential nonsense for as long as CNN continues to insist we must.
Personally I’m less worried about a Putin than I am about a Xi.
Xi’s rise is methodical, fully systematized, popular where it needs to be, it is supported by elite institutions and people, and will reproduce itself. Trump is an idiosyncratic detour to the Xi scenario. The thing about Xi is that he’s not “enormously popular” as a personality…I’m less worried about enormously popular idiots… If I worry, I worry about the systemic consolidation of powerful institutions by people I’ve never heard of. One of them is our future Xi. It has nothing to do with The Squad and their back-bencher performative acts.Report
Anyone who tries to become a dictator by consolidating power within the Democratic Party will be sorely disappointed.Report
Eh… it’ll be something catchy like the Reformed Democratic party or the Democratic League or some such. Our parties aren’t anything useful other than a branding mechanism. I don’t think the Democratic Party as it’s constituted has much of a shelf life anyway, though.Report
It’ll be interesting to see if either party disappears. The parties have been around so long they might just live on, at least in name, for a long time to come.
The current Republican Party is kind of like a rock band who’s only original member is the drummer, but still tours under the original moniker. An R from 20 years ago would hardly believe what’s going on in his party’s name today.Report
A lot of R’s from 20 years ago have openly abandoned the GOP.Report
It isn’t Trump anymore, it is the Trumpists, all 75 million of them, crying out for a dictator to take power away from those who they refuse to acknowledge as fully equal citizens.Report
Heh… all 75M of them. The daily riots are… oh wait. Sheesh.
Honestly, this is just textbook othering.Report
It’s so hard to be somebody who just wants a world where anybody who’s not a straight Christian knows their proper place in society, which is below.Report
See, the problem for people like us here at OT, is that we have nothing to fear from either the left or the right.
For those of us who are white, straight, educated, gainfully employed and nominally Christian, there is no conceivable scenario in which we are oppressed.
There will never be gulags for white people, or re-education camps for Christians. There will never be a purge of straight people, and no man will be forced to wear a dress by President Frank N. Furter.
So for us, this is all sort of vicarious. Our fear is the fear of watching our country devolve into something awful. But awful for other people.
I say this only because of how easy it is for us to be detached and civil and objective. To see this as like barstool sports where we are chatting about the Bears or the Lakers.
Our counterparts in Russia and China aren’t the dissidents or Uighurs; Our counterparts are the comfortable bourgeoisie who support Xi or Putin, or at least, have no reason to oppose them.Report
That’s one heck of a pivot.
“Trump is a buffoonish incompetent leader, a Yeltsin, not a Putin.”
“You just want people under your thumb!”
I’m waiting for the hoarders and wreckers talking points to start showing up. (It would have worked, without hoarders and wreckers.)Report
You certainly have a point about Xi but China hawks trying to amp up the threat that China poses way exaggerate it. China’s a big player on the world stage- with a population that size it should be- but China’s whole “power” structure is built on sand. They have an ecological crisis and a demographic crisis that’re poised to land on them with both feet basically at the same time and their power, such as it is, is primarily based on their position in a lot of supply chains. But that power has accumulated primarily because they haven’t used it. If China keeps being “ugly China” and the rest of the world accommodates change then those supply chains will shift away and then China will end up a big nation full of aging people with no prospects for dealing with their senescence and a desperate need for labor and raw materials. Xi seems kind of dangerous but only in as much as China itself is dangerous. I don’t see how Xi is special.
I’ll grant that the cultural left has certainly been collecting some scalps, though in fairness they’re really small potatoes scalps and they’ve been collected mainly through non-governmental action- but there’s something massively ironic about a Republican President with the cowardly acquiescence and tacit support of his entire parties formal power structure trying to overturn the election of a moderate Democrat (after the explicit, decisive and unambiguous electoral repudiation of the left by the Democratic Party in their primaries) and right wingers instead look at the squad and twitter and say “yes, the true threat to the polity is obviously going to arise from the left.”Report
I think you’re right about Xi. There was a long article in the Atlantic Monthly about how China is setting up a surveillance state, and it was absolutely chilling reading. All done with the acquiescence of the staring at the phones masses.Report
I think a serious list would have Wilson at #1. FDR is a solid #2, probably followed by Adams and Jackson. Who would round out the top five? Maybe Nixon, or Teddy Roosevelt? I don’t think Trump would be in the top ten. You don’t even have to go too revisionist to have Lincoln above him.Report
How did you leave off Obama?Report
Serious question or not?Report
You’ve expresses many times that Obama is really no different fromTrump, so, yes, serious.Report
In terms of personality, yes.
I don’t know where I’d rank the Obama presidency in terms of authoritarianism. It’s a tough call because the expected parameters of executive activity are so much greater than they used to be. I’ve said on many occasions that his NLRB move troubles me more than anything else he did. The idea that a president can declare Congress out of session in order to make recess appointments is borderline impeachable. In terms of impact, it was only two board members, but in terms of contempt for the Constitution, it outdistances anything else that’s happened in the 2000’s. I have such strong feelings about it that I don’t trust my ability to appraise the Obama presidency in terms of authoritarianism at all.Report
Congress was out of session by all normal indications. McConnell played pro forma games to deny recess appointments, and Obama called him on it. The court weighed in, and that was the end of that.
Compare that to 4 years of ignoring Congressional subpoenas. It isn’t in the same ballpark.Report
My beef with Obama starts with his embrace of the highly misnamed Patriot Act, most notably its warrantless wiretapping aimed at internet content and email. Like several democrats before him, he embraced the delusional notion that in order to appear “strong” on national security he had to out do Republican. Just that open thing did more to taint his presidency then anything else, though his neoliberal economic orthodoxy runs a very close second.Report
Just that open thing did more to taint his presidency then anything else, though his neoliberal economic orthodoxy runs a very close second.
Presidents who accept expert consensus are the worst! Did you know that he also bought into the expert consensus on climate change? I heard that he’s telling people to get the COVID-19 vaccine, too.
You must love Trump. He never listens to those eggheads.Report
The upside of a pandemic is that going to war becomes more costly, and you have a bunch of other things to worry about. The downside is the opportunity for greater internal oppression.Report
OW7: In which the world again deals with the issue of vice law or how free people should be to make bad decisions. There is definitely an obesity pandemic in the world but using heavy handed tactics to combat it seem unwise and not likely to work. The obesity pandemic might be one of those problems without a solution.Report
My son is a bit pudgy. We don’t keep sweets, or bagged snacks at home. But he goes to school, and gets snacks like fruit roll ups, or sweet quick breads, and chocolate milk, and cereal. It’s all packaged as ‘healthy’ (fruit roll-ups made with real fruit and juice, nothing artificial; whole grain frosted flakes, etc.), but it’s still calories he doesn’t really need.Report
I believe the issue is lifestyle much more than availability. And to be clear I don’t mean that personally, we’re all guilty of it. From the way we do education all the way up to how we earn a living we are chained to desks and screens. It’s so easy to stress eat stuff out of a package and never get around to taking a jog. Thr inbox is always overflowing.Report
This too. Not enough recess time at school for kids. Bug usually slims down in the summer when we can kick him out of the house for hours everyday after school.Report
Lifestyle is part of it, but the food pyramid used to be different.
Also, the HFCS thing has me wondering whether there ought to be important studies done.
But Iowa, man. First Caucus in the country.Report
Heh… Done and Done.
There’s not the slightest ambiguity about the health impact of HFCS.Report
But they made commercials!
Which, seriously, made me even more paranoid.Report
Hah… nice.
Yeah, corn syrup is just sugar… this ‘issue’ is we put sugar in all sorts of foods where we don’t need to put sugar. Now if you read labels carefully they break out HFCS, Dextrose, Palm sugar, etc. etc.
Of course a popsicle has sugars… that’s the point; the turn-about to that commercial is putting Honey on Pizza or piling sugar on potato chips or coating your salad in a thick ooze of Dextrose. Which is basically how we eat.Report
People definitely burned more calories when most of us did physical labor for a living. Even white color workers probably burned more calories because they had to walk more places and do other stuff without computers.Report
[OW1]
Thank God that nothing like that could happen here, even in Florida.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/21/us/rebekah-jones-florida-lawsuit-invs/index.html
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/florida-sanction-daniel-uhlfelder-grim-reaper-beach_n_5fd8d2a4c5b663c3759a0c9cReport
[OW8]
“Archeologists remain puzzled by the inscription ‘Duos denarios, et hoc est præbuistis ei gladium suum collo meo'”.Report