I’m Not a Midwesterner; No One Is

Derek Edwards

Derek runs The Edwards Edition, which is his review and commentary blog, along with A Running Commentary, a weekly newsletter about things that aren't getting their own post.

Related Post Roulette

18 Responses

  1. Marchmaine says:

    Counterpoint: This is a lovely Taxonomy of the Mid-West.Report

  2. Burt Likko says:

    Those amongst us who use Westlaw will have need to know that the citations to its regional case reporters ate based on old-fashioned books. The first of these was created in 1876 by West Publishing’s namesake, and called the North Western Reporter, currently on its second series (“N.W.2d”). The North Western Reporter contains published appellate court case decisions for Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. I’ve always thought it was ridiculous to call this particular grouping of states “North Western,” and from where I’m currently sitting in Oregon (an actually northwestern state) especially so. “Mid Western Reporter” would make more sense to me but I suppose even John Briggs West back in the 1870’s didn’t dare wade into these taxonomic territories.Report

  3. JTinWS says:

    I just wanted to say I really like this essay. Bravo to the author.Report

  4. PD Shaw says:

    I always feared Big Ten expansion would facilitate the further loss of geographic meaning.

    I think Midwest has a pretty clear meaning. It refers in its original sense to the territories created by the Northwest Ordinance. Inspired by Jefferson’s more idealistic visions of the future, it was a place of public schools, non-establishment of religion, surveyed and gridded townships and most importantly no slavery. The failure by one vote in 1784 for a common western policy meant there would be for a considerable time two frontiers, a northern one and a southern. Additional differentiation would originate with the Eerie Canal, the development of canals and railroads, and immigration particularly from Germany.

    Three sides of the border are pretty clear, Canada to the North, the Appalachian mountains (the British Proclamation line prohibiting settlement) to the east, and the Ohio River to the South. The western extent is more murky. Pretty easy to include the entirety of Minnesota given part of it was in the Northwest Territory, and Iowa given that it was admitted to the Union before Minnesota and Wisconsin. The hard line is probably the 98th meridian, the line where rainfall drops perceptively and a lot of things don’t work like they did to the east and the assumption that they did caused a lot of pain, hardship and death.Report

    • Michael Cain in reply to PD Shaw says:

      The Midwest ends no more than halfway across Kansas, Nebraska, and the Dakotas, maybe only a third. If you look at one of the US at night satellite maps, you can see exactly where the Midwestern settlement pattern of a small town every few miles, a bigger one every 20 or 30, disappears. Agriculture becomes western, as you note: dependent on water rights and irrigation*. The western edge of Kansas gets 16 inches of precipitation per year, the SE corner of the state 46. Two-thirds of the Great Plains (my county map of that here) has never been plowed; a third has never even been regularly grazed. I’ll be happy to provide links to where that definition of the GP comes from, and argue why it’s the right one. Among other reasons, the settlement line that is so clear in the nighttime map runs pretty much down the eastern edge of the GP.

      For more recent readers, I’m the commenter and occasional poster who’s out on the lunatic fringe and asserts that having to deal with climate change will be so much different in the West than in the rest of the country that there will be a partition of some sort.

      * Think the Pacific NW is different? Go price land in the Willamette Valley that has irrigation rights compared to land without. In the critical months of July and August, Portland is normally drier than Denver.Report

    • STEPHEN in reply to PD Shaw says:

      Incorrect. The word midwest, in its original sense, refers to Kansas and Nebraska. It is the middle belt of the the then west, as opposed to (not coterminous with) the territories created by the Northwest Ordinance and the “Southwest”.Report

  5. Pinky says:

    I like a lot of this analysis. Every region, when viewed from the inside, has more inconsistencies than consistencies. I’d probably put your Ohio River valley and Appalachia into a kind of Poverty Belt down to Louisiana. There’s definitely an Ohio/Dakotas/Oklahoma stretch that basically differs by which food is produced, and how well. That region probably should include most of your Great Lakes region too. Much of Michigan, Wisconsin, et cetera are aren’t really defined by the “rust belt” anymore. The US east coast, and the Rockies and westward, are their own things.Report

  6. Fish says:

    I grew up in Kansas. When I was active duty I’d meet people from Illinois and Indiana and Ohio and they’d tell me they were from the “midwest.” At some point I started asking how a state east of the Mississippi could be considered “midwest.”

    It strikes me that this is similar to what happens when we try to nail down a definition for “art.”Report

    • Derek Edwards in reply to Fish says:

      Well, like I said, “Midwest” is really just the name for a place that used to be the West before the U.S. got more west. Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio were part of the Northwest Territory, which was the western limit of U.S. territory until the Louisiana Purchase, which Kansas was part of, which was the western edge until the Mexican-American War ended with the U.S. in control of California and the Southwest.Report

  7. Sue Ravenscroft says:

    Having been born and reared in Detroit Michigan and moving to central Iowa at age 50 I totally support the writer’s distinction of the Great Lakes region from other parts of the Midwest. I hadn’t realized that the Midwest had a multiple personality disorder until I moved here. So many differences from the obvious, e.g. number of tourists? differs greatly, to the more subtle (lots more indirect speech and passive aggression in Lutheran Iowa). I could go on and on…Report

    • Des Moines is just far enough out from the Greater Rust Belt that it never went through the catastrophic inner city population collapse that Detroit did.

      I have asserted before that one of the problems the Democratic Party has at the national level is that there’s one urban wing where the core cities collapsed and may never recover (eg, Detroit and St. Louis). There’s another urban wing where “urban problems” means almost unmanageable job and population growth. I’m not convinced that those two can be reconciled.Report