Throughput: Gas Stoves, Water Drops, And Various Kinds of Hot Air

Michael Siegel

Michael Siegel is an astronomer living in Pennsylvania. He blogs at his own site, and has written a novel.

Related Post Roulette

16 Responses

  1. Dark Matter says:

    Like it all.Report

  2. Chip Daniels says:

    I don’t have a strong opinion wrt gas stoves.

    FWIW, the apartment developers I work with prefer all-electric units if only because the cost of running a gas line to every single unit and the resulting size of the main meter bank. And renters don’t have a strong enough preference to make that worthwhile.

    But ventilation has become an important issue because modern buildings have become so good at sealing out drafts its almost like living in a plastic sealed environment. So outside air systems and operable windows are generally necessary.Report

    • But ventilation has become an important issue because modern buildings have become so good at sealing out drafts its almost like living in a plastic sealed environment. So outside air systems and operable windows are generally necessary.

      Our new townhouse has a vent fan that runs constantly because there’s not enough fresh air ingress to maintain acceptable pollutant levels otherwise. This in contrast to the previous house, bought in 1988, where we spent thousands of dollars getting rid of obvious drafts. Our current range hood vents to the outside for similar reasons. The whole place smells like garlic and onions if I forget to flip the (quite noisy) vent fan on.Report

  3. Saul Degraw says:

    When we were looking at purchasing a home, one of my demands was a gas stove. I am used to looking on a gas range and in a gas oven. My experiences at cooking on electric stoves and ranges has been unpleasant. That being said, it would never occur to me to seethe in rebellion on “maybe gas stoves are not great” as a political ax to grindReport

    • KenB in reply to Saul Degraw says:

      “maybe gas stoves are not great” is a disingenuous framing. As the OP says: “the Consumer Products Safety Commission floated the idea of a ban on new gas stoves,” and actually I believe the idea that it would just be on new stoves was a later clarification after the storm had already begun.Report

      • Saul Degraw in reply to KenB says:

        Yeah, it would be on new construction/appliances, if anything happened but right-wingers went wild with it.Report

        • Jaybird in reply to Saul Degraw says:

          Old stoves will be grandfathered in! I don’t know why right-wingers are so upset! They already own homes! This is screwing over people who can’t afford new houses anyway!

          You’d think that they’d be more sympathetic to this encroachment!Report

          • Chip Daniels in reply to Jaybird says:

            Fox needs to give it a catchy name, like Stovemageddon, or Stovepocalypse.

            And there’s got to be a government memo somewhere suggesting that vaccinated people can keep their stoves. Or that guns will be confiscated as well.Report

          • Michael Cain in reply to Jaybird says:

            Random thought… In the long term, natural gas will be phased out just as coal is being phased out currently (assuming we really mean to get rid of greenhouse gas emissions). At some point, as gas furnaces and stoves are replaced with electric ones, there will come a day when the natural gas utility simply says, “There aren’t enough customers in this area to justify keeping all the pipes maintained and pressurized.”Report

        • KenB in reply to Saul Degraw says:

          Right so like I said, your initial framing was BS — there’s a big difference between “maybe gas stoves are not great” and “the Federal government is considering banning new gas stoves”. Beyond that, it’s funny that your only take is the “right-wingers” who “went wild” — I’m opposed to this and i’m not a right-winger and I didn’t go wild, I just think it’s a stupid overreaction to this study (without even getting into the question of whether this should be in the executive branch’s ability to do unilaterally).

          Any issue that comes up will have silly overreactions on both sides, but if your only response is to point at the silly people on the other side rather than considering the issue on the merits, you’ll let all kinds of stupid BS through.Report

  4. ThTh4:

    🎶 You put the lime in the concrete and mix it all up 🎶Report

  5. ThTh8: What I observed during the early part of the pandemic was streets being almost deserted and drivers assuming they’d be unlikely to encounter cross-traffic, so more near-misses when they did. Stoplight timing seemed to be altered to increase the amount of “both direction red” time, I presume as a safety measure.Report

  6. Michael Cain says:

    ThTh10: $40B over ten years is three to five nuclear power stations, which is hardly a dent in what needs to be done for carbon retirement over the next ten years. TTBOMK, the only nuclear plants anyone is serious about are Vogtle 3 and 4 in Georgia, the UAMPS small modular thing in Idaho, and the Gates/Buffett still-undesigned molten salt reactor in Wyoming. All of those appear at present that they will be some of the most expensive electricity in the regions where they will operate.Report