Michael Siegel

Michael Siegel is an astronomer living in Pennsylvania. He blogs at his own site, and has written a novel.

Related Post Roulette

4 Responses

  1. Michael Cain says:

    Another asteroid concept that seems to be gaining greater awareness is rubble-pile structure: asteroids that aren’t big single chunks of rock, but are a collection of small chunks held loosely together by gravity. That suggests the question of “What will the result of DART be if Dimorphos is a rubble pile?” My (uninformed) intuition would be that there are at least some possibilities where the kinetic energy of an impactor produces results that make no change to the trajectory of the pile as a whole, eg deformation of the overall shape or rotation. What do we try next if we didn’t nudge Dimorphos’s trajectory?Report

    • Jaybird in reply to Michael Cain says:

      Wouldn’t that make Dimorphos about a jillion times more likely to be eaten by the atmosphere on the way down?Report

      • Michael Cain in reply to Jaybird says:

        I don’t know. I don’t understand rubble-pile physics. My guess would be that a sizeable pile impacting at 20 km/sec straight down would behave much like a solid object of similar size and density, but it’s just a guess.

        That’s with the pile as an impactor. Related to the OP, I’m interested in the pile as impactee.Report

  2. Kolohe says:

    Related, and I’m not sure if this has been posted elsewhere on this site (and others may have seen already it via twitter or other means)

    Google “Nasa DART Mission” (quotes aren’t necessary and I don’t think capitalization matters either)

    and wait a sec.Report