A Boymom’s Thoughts on Girls’ Athletics

Jennifer Worrel

Jennifer Worrel is a transplant from the Great Plains raising two sons and a husband in Metro Atlanta. Extremely likable until you get to know her, she remains a great invite to a dinner party. She prefers peeing in the woods to peeing on private planes and was once told by her husband that she is “way funnier online.” Writes about whatever interests her, she knows a little about a lot. For fun, she enjoys cooking from scratch and watching old Milton Friedman videos on YouTube. Jennifer's thoughts are her own and do not represent the views or position of any firm or affiliate she is lucky enough to associate with.

Related Post Roulette

32 Responses

  1. Oscar Gordon says:

    It could be that they just want to play baseball. Baseball and softball, while very similar, are not the same sport.Report

    • This. Men’s and women’s golf is not the same game. I can understand Michelle Wie’s desire to know, “Can I play the game competively on courses laid out for men?” Each of the three fencing weapons is a different sport. I know women who have fought to get their clubs to let them be an epee fencer, not a foil fencer. The NBA and the WNBA don’t play the same sport. A woman who played in the WNBA with the same sort of physical contact allowed/required in the NBA would foul out in minutes.Report

      • DensityDuck in reply to Michael Cain says:

        But is that a learned style of play, or is that physical inability to perform the activity? Like, the women who wanted to be epee fencers, did they have the equivalent performance of a man of similar size and strength, or was there something about being Female that stopped them being as good?

        Like, I could see an argument that a body which experienced exposure primarily to gonadal estrogen during adolescence would develop in a different way than a body which experienced exposure to gonadal testosterone, and that a game based on performing certain actions would reward bodies developed in a way that was optimized for those actions, and thus you would expect the top performance levels of certain sports to feature almost entirely estrogen-influenced or testosterone-influenced bodies. But that’s not saying that persons with non-optimal bodies are inherently incapable no matter what, that’s just saying the same thing as “a guy who’s not in good shape will not be at the peak performance level of a sport”.Report

      • Brandon Berg in reply to Michael Cain says:

        Why has women’s fencing traditionally been limited to foil?Report

        • It’s the lightest of the three weapons. The way the right-of-way rules are interpreted reduce the role that strength plays. Eg, if you make contact appropriately with your opponent’s blade, it is deemed a proper parry. You don’t have to actually control your opponent’s blade. Corps-à-corps — body-to-body contact — causes an immediate halt in action, and is often a red-card violation. For a very long time the conventional wisdom was that women weren’t disadvantaged in foil, so could do it “right”.

          There’s also plenty of misogyny. Fencing coaches and administrators tend to continue until they’re elderly, so their attitudes carry on for a very long time. When I picked fencing up again a dozen years ago, I worked with a coach who was in his 70s, who had learned from a coach that was active in the sport in the 1930s. Foil was the only women’s fencing event at the Olympics until 1996, when epee was added. Women’s saber not until 2004. I knew a woman here in Colorado who wanted to fence epee back in the 1970s who described to me how hard she had to work to get enough women in the sport around the country organized to make it happen in US fencing.Report

          • LeeEsq in reply to Michael Cain says:

            Foil might be lighter than epee or sabre but it isn’t like modern epees or sabres or superheavy real swords that require a great deal of physical strength to wield properly. The modern electronic scoring system also gets rid of a lot of these “concerns.”Report

            • Michael Cain in reply to LeeEsq says:

              When foilists come down to the epee end of the gym, the first thing they say when they get on the strip is invariably some version of, “Geez, I always forget how heavy these things are.” I’ve been away for a couple of years now. If I can find a place to start again, the first six months are going to be miserable while I get my forearm/wrist/hand back in shape.

              A modern epee is somewhat lighter than a rapier but generally a tad heavier than the shortsword that displaced the rapier. None of these are in the same category with melee and heavy infantry weapons, of course. And the techniques for those heavy weapons are completely different.

              I’ve had the opportunity to handle period shortswords — had to wear cotton gloves, skin oils are not kind to antique weapons — and run through a handful of standard moves. Very, very much like an epee in weight and balance.

              Electric scoring indicates touches. It has nothing to do with right-of-way, corps-à-corps, or the other complicated parts of the sport.Report

              • Oscar Gordon in reply to Michael Cain says:

                Thing is, there is no reason a woman can’t develop the arm strength to handle a fencing sword. As you say, they aren’t in the weight class of military weapons, nor are the athletes expected to penetrate armor.

                It’s not like a woman wanting to be an offensive tackle on a man’s football team while only weighing a buck and a quarter.Report

              • Don’t know. Perhaps because foil is more about fooling your opponent. Perhaps because it’s a small sport, and as you come up the groups are almost always mixed gender, and epee and saber reward height and strength more than foil does. But women foilists are more common than women epeeists or women sabrists. Might matter that for insurance reasons, you have to be ten to get into a class.Report

              • Oscar Gordon in reply to Michael Cain says:

                Still, no significant reason a woman can’t do epee or sabre, only pros & cons on the margins.Report

              • LeeEsq in reply to Michael Cain says:

                I haven’t fenced since college, so twenty years, but the weight was literally not a problem with changing from foil to epee. I reached my maximum height of 5’5′ at fifteen and weighed a staggering 135 pounds, so it wasn’t like I was a titan of strength at the time.Report

          • CJColucci in reply to Michael Cain says:

            There may be size- or strength-related reasons to believe that women would not be competitive with men in epee or saber — I’m agnostic about that — but those aren’t reasons that they couldn’t fence epee or saber against other women.
            Has anyone ever matched top male and female foil fencers against each other? If so, how did it turn out?Report

    • Kazzy in reply to Oscar Gordon says:

      I don’t even really understand why we make this gendered distinction with regards to baseball and softball. Why is one a “boys’” sport and one a “girls’”?Report

      • Jaybird in reply to Kazzy says:

        I asked this in the late 80’s/early 90’s and the answer was given to me then was that underhand pitching does less damage to pitchers’ shoulders.

        I don’t know if that same explanation is given in the current year.Report

      • DensityDuck in reply to Kazzy says:

        Stronger people throw faster and swing harder, and modern sports culture is…let’s say more accepting of men modifying their bodies to increase strength than it is of women (not to mention the whole hormone-reaction thing causing men to get more results more quickly from strength training) so you’ll find a lot more strong men than you will strong women.

        What this means is that at the pro levels (where you expect players to be in peak physical condition) you’ll see a major difference between male players and female players, to the point that selecting female players will be seen as a handicap in overall team performance. So either you have female leagues, or you accept that there won’t be any women on the field anywhereReport

        • Brandon Berg in reply to DensityDuck says:

          Kazzy wasn’t asking why there are sex-segregated leagues, which is fairly obvious, but why they play different sports, specifically why baseball is a male sport and softball is a female sport.Report

          • LeeEsq in reply to Brandon Berg says:

            My guess is that a lot of this is from much more sexist times when it wasn’t really appropriate for girls and women to be athletic in the first place but there were some grudging exceptions made because girls wanted to play sports to. The idea of girls and women doing actions that had a good chance of really getting them physically hurt like boys was deemed too unlady-like.Report

          • DensityDuck in reply to Brandon Berg says:

            I kind of got off that track, but in baseball the balls are thrown faster (even compared to “fast-pitch” softball).Report

      • Pinky in reply to Kazzy says:

        I don’t think softball is more for females, but it’s less physically demanding in most respects, making it easier to play more recreationally.

        There’s a big difference between fastpitch and slowpitch softball. The batter’s reaction time in fastpitch softball is comparable to baseball. But beyond that, softball is just less physically demanding. Smaller field, larger ball, lighter bats.Report

      • JS in reply to Kazzy says:

        Softball is quite common, at least around here, for older players. Lots of 30+ players (both gender) playing softball around here.

        So it’s double odd, because it’s quite clearly not a gendered sport for adults.Report

        • Kazzy in reply to JS says:

          In my town, the kids play teeball together. Then by first grade they’re separated.

          Then the adults play softball.

          Go figure.Report

          • InMD in reply to Kazzy says:

            There are only 2 types of adult soft ball players. Elite female athletes and guys 20 pounds overweight from spending every Sunday drinking tall boys.Report

            • Kazzy in reply to InMD says:

              Plus those young adult co-ed leagues every city has.Report

            • JS in reply to InMD says:

              My cousins would disagree. It may simply be there are are no adult baseball leagues, but all three play softball.

              One is, bluntly, at “professional athlete” levels of fitness. The other two are at “Even the most picky doctors would have no complaints” level of fitness.

              They’ve always been highly athletic, and the professional level one keeps the other two in shape. 🙂

              Seriously, my younger cousin is a marvel. He was almost good enough to go pro in his chosen sport after college, but not quite. He kept the fitness routines.Report

              • Kazzy in reply to JS says:

                So… it would seem…

                Baseball is for boys and men and maybe very young girls depending on what you consider T-ball to be and when the leagues divide by gender.
                Softball is for girls and men and women.

                WTF?Report

              • Pinky in reply to Kazzy says:

                I don’t see what the problem here is. Baseball is more physically challenging.Report

              • JS in reply to Kazzy says:

                To the point where the OP assumed that any girl wanting to play baseball must be doing it out of some weird reverse sexism because they believed only men were the real athletes.

                I’d have just assumed they wanted to play baseball not softball.Report

  2. DensityDuck says:

    Second Wave Feminism versus Third Wave Feminism.Report

  3. PD Shaw says:

    In my experience with club soccer, the dynamics are a bit different. A girl playing on a boy’s team has usually been borrowed from a girl’s team. She is playing both. Usually though it’s a sign of a thin club because otherwise they would be borrowing a younger boy.Report

  4. Frank Benlin says:

    > I’d link to a clip of Walter Mathau introducing Tatum O’Neal’s character to the rest of the Bears, but it hasn’t aged well over the last 45 years

    The first 1:56 is nice, but NSFW after that

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm61r3qnPKQReport

  5. JS says:

    “The real tragedy is that there are females who can’t see a competitor as worthy unless they are male.”

    You clearly believe it or something close. Because it never crossed your mind that they’re playing baseball because they wanted to play baseball, not softball. They’re different sports.

    But you made a gendered divide between the two sports (“softball is for girls, baseball is for boys”) and assumed anyone playing the “wrong” sport must be doing it to “prove something”.

    It reeks of projection.

    (And as an irony: There are multiple adult softball leagues near me. It’s not gendered at all — plenty of both play, in pretty much equal numbers — might even be male dominated, but I’ve never counted).Report

  6. When my kids (one of each) were young they both played Little League baseball for a few years. There weren’t a lot of girls, maybe one or two per team, but some were quite good; in fact one of my kids’ teams got much worse when their best player, a girl, was drafted up to a higher league.

    When she started middle school, my daughter switched to softball, because she wanted to play on a girls’ team, but she didn’t like the game nearly as much. The batting helmet with a face guard and the double first base(*) made it too, well, girly.

    * If you’ve never seen this, the batter runs to one first base, while the first baseman has to step on a different first base a few feet away. This is to prevent collisions.Report