Ukrainian President Zelenskyy's heartbreaking, defiant speech to the Russian people [English sub.]
- Next story From the Associated Press: CDC: Many healthy Americans can take a break from masks
- Previous story From NBC News: Biden Picks Jackson for Supreme Court, Putting Her on a Path to History
Search
TEN SECOND BUZZ
- From WaPo: The Bidet Business is BoomingMarch 19, 2024No Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 3/18/2024March 18, 20246 Comments
- From Punchbowl News: More Government Shutdown Cowbell, AgainMarch 18, 20241 Comment
- From WaPo: Don Lemon Films First Episode for X with Elon Musk, Promptly FiredMarch 14, 202410 Comments
- Biden and Trump Mathematically Secure Party NominationsMarch 13, 2024No Comments
Features
Hot Posts
A Message From Devcat
We have been experiencing some system resource issues. We believe the problem may be resolved, but if it is not please bear with us.
Recent Comments
- KenB in reply to Jaybird on Fani Willis Survives, But Not UnscathedWe can also charge a fixed cost of $20,000 and do only 10 hours of work because it's off the shelf,…
- Jaybird in reply to KenB on Fani Willis Survives, But Not UnscathedWork on something for 15 minutes? Charge an hour! You can get 4 hours an hour this way.
- KenB in reply to Jaybird on Fani Willis Survives, But Not UnscathedI have no interesting opinions on Wade, but I will say (speaking as someone who is not a lawyer but…
- Jaybird in reply to Koz on Fani Willis Survives, But Not UnscathedOh please. We have several lawyers on the board and every single one of them will tell you that ther…
- Koz in reply to DavidTC on Fani Willis Survives, But Not UnscathedIt will be interesting to see what sort of weird cognitive dissonances this causes, as Republicans l…
- DavidTC in reply to Koz on Fani Willis Survives, But Not UnscathedOk, so what? Is that a crime? I don’t think so. That specific crime would be GA § 16-4-7. Criminal S…
- Brandon Berg on From NBC News: Virginia bans public universities from considering legacy in admissionsI've been told by people who are much better than I am that, as an opponent of affirmative action---…
- DavidTC in reply to Dark Matter on Open Mic for the week of 3/18/2024No, delaying sure as hell doesn't help. Because delaying requires him paying $450 million bond, wher…
- Koz in reply to Dark Matter on Fani Willis Survives, But Not UnscathedIt surprises me a little bit how many people are willing to say this sort of thing. Just to mention…
- Dark Matter on Fani Willis Survives, But Not UnscathedShe was clearly doing a favor to her boyfriend, i.e. help make him famous by being involved in a big…
Comics
-
March 19, 2024
-
March 18, 2024
-
March 17, 2024
-
March 16, 2024
More Comments
- Dark Matter in reply to Jaybird on Fani Willis Survives, But Not Unscathed
- Dark Matter on From NBC News: Virginia bans public universities from considering legacy in admissions
- Dark Matter in reply to Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 3/18/2024
- DavidTC on Kacey Musgraves Does What Taylor Swift Hasn’t: Grow Up
- Koz in reply to Pinky on Fani Willis Survives, But Not Unscathed
- Koz in reply to North on Fani Willis Survives, But Not Unscathed
- Pinky in reply to North on Fani Willis Survives, But Not Unscathed
- North in reply to Koz on Fani Willis Survives, But Not Unscathed
- Koz in reply to North on Fani Willis Survives, But Not Unscathed
- Pinky in reply to LeeEsq on A Literal Bloodbath?
- Philip H in reply to Michael Cain on Open Mic for the week of 3/18/2024
- Michael Cain in reply to Dark Matter on Open Mic for the week of 3/18/2024
- Dark Matter in reply to Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 3/18/2024
- North in reply to Chip Daniels on Fani Willis Survives, But Not Unscathed
- Chip Daniels in reply to North on Fani Willis Survives, But Not Unscathed
Not sure the best place to put this but what a debacle for Russia. I can’t imagine the Finns would make this announcement if the vote in parliament to apply for NATO membership wasn’t a sure thing.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-61420185.ampReport
NATO is dead, long live NATO.Report
As wrongheaded as I think previous expansions were, given the trajectory we’re on, I look at this one a bit differently. At least you can actually make a case for Finland (and I assume now Sweden too) as a net contributor with a straight face, particularly as a package deal. That’s way better than newly opened markets for our defense industr-, er uh, defenseless nascent democracies whose freedom must be secured!Report
My point is that NATO can be whatever we wants it to be… but we’re giving up a lot of the strength that NATO had for being a tight alliance backstopped by US Power and leadership.
Overlooked is that as NATO grows, Baltic, East European, Turkish, (Near East/Steppe), concerns may or may not align with Original NATO or (increasingly) US interests which *reduces* the credible threat that one country attacked will trigger the response of all. Or, possibly worse, it will.
The irony is that Ukraine is demonstrating that secondary alliances (maybe even offshore balancing) is working… and that Poland is hemmed in by NATO in ways it needn’t be. So too will Finland/Sweden be. We could position soft power in the form of Hardware/Systems integration with Western/NATO arms as part of this balancing.
By adding Finland/Sweden we gain little and give up flexible responses while exposing risk and risking exposing that NATO really won’t go to war for Estonia… or worse, NATO goes to war via Erdogan or some other out of theater trigger event.
Remaking NATO as a sort of UN with guns isn’t necessarily a thing we can actually do. There are lots of collective action problems that we should see as obvious pitfalls given our experience with, well, the UN. If we break the thing that makes NATO good, have we made NATO better?Report
I look at it differently.
Guaranteeing that the Finnish and also probably Swedish militiaries (particularly airforces) are in play makes conventional defense of the Baltic states and Poland way more plausible than it ever has been. Assuming kicking people out of the alliance isn’t on the table, it makes what was probably a stupid bluff to begin with far more difficult for Russia to call. That’s a real gain in my opinion even if it’s luck making up for bad strategy.
Regarding operational independence I think that’s right for a country like Poland. We now know they could probably roll in to support the Ukrainian government with Western equipment and defeat the Russian army as long as the fight stays conventional (or hopefully provide enough deterrence this didn’t happen to begin with). In fairness we didn’t know that 3 months ago but conceptually it makes sense and is a sounder long term strategy than what we did.
However I don’t think that is as much of an issue for Finland and Sweden. They’re both non-aligned, neutral countries with some degree of geographic isolation, but for Russia on the doorstep. They don’t do anything expeditionary on their own and, judging from current events, they aren’t going to drag the alliance into anything it wouldn’t already be involved in.
So while we’ve taken the wrong strategy, I think we’re stuck with it, so we might as well strengthen our hand as long as we aren’t courting any new catastrophes by doing so.Report
Fair enough; we weigh the benefits differently. I see it as a net degradation of NATO.Report
If expansion hadn’t happened or downsizing was realistically on the table I’d agree 100%.Report