Sunday Halloween Morning! Seconds (1966)

Rufus F.

Rufus is a likeable curmudgeon. He has a PhD in History, sang for a decade in a punk band, and recently moved to NYC after nearly two decades in Canada. He wrote the book "The Paris Bureau" from Dio Press (2021).

Related Post Roulette

10 Responses

  1. He insists that Arthur must go to that address the next day and use the name “Wilson.” He goes to the address: it’s a dingy laundry.

    Should have been a volleyball factory.Report

  2. LeeEsq says:

    A few years ago, a friend and I had a Halloween movie viewing night. His selection was Rob Zombie’s interpretation of Halloween. My choice was M by Fritz Lang. The reaction to the movie was “damn it Lee, this is real scary not fake scary.”Report

  3. PD Shaw says:

    Uncanny. I watched the Babadook last night for the first time, and here I find that nobody needs to hear about the Babadook, which is true now, but it apparently wasn’t when this was written? In any event, I’ve watched a few Australian horror/suspense/fantasy movies the last couple of weeks: Picnic at Hanging Rock (1975); The Last Wave (1977), The Dreaming (1988); and the other one. I go with The Last Wave as my favorite of these.Report

    • Rufus F. in reply to PD Shaw says:

      I really enjoyed the Babadook. I just meant that there are a handful of newer horror movies that were sufficiently well-received that they tend to make a LOT of lists of new horror classics: It Follows, the Babadook, the VVitch, Us. I’m a horror geek anyway and I really dug all of those movies, but wanted to go for something that maybe doesn’t make as many lists of scary movies for Halloween.

      I wrote a lot about Seconds and kind of ran out of room, but I also was thinking about writing about The Seventh Victim, which is one of those scary movies that I can’t believe exists at all, much less from 1943. It’s one where, if David Fincher remade it without changing anything, you’d think it was a little too bleak for him!Report

      • PD Shaw in reply to Rufus F. says:

        Sorry, I was joking with you. Watch enough of these movies, and there can be no coincidences. I’ll probably watch Second on your recommendation, but I skimmed past the spoilers.Report

  4. dhex says:

    great choice! seconds is both amazing and such an obvious metaphor for the closet of the hollywood 50s that i was shocked it got made. maybe subtlety was more subtly recognized back when?Report

    • Rufus F. in reply to dhex says:

      Yeah! The funny thing is I was so blown away by the movie the first time I saw it that I didn’t even pick up on that until maybe the second or third time I saw it. Just such a powerful movie with such a gutting ending.Report