Considering The Entire Life of Colin Powell

Michael Siegel

Michael Siegel is an astronomer living in Pennsylvania. He blogs at his own site, and has written a novel.

Related Post Roulette

4 Responses

  1. Chris says:

    He was assigned to investigate a letter from a serving soldier that reinforced allegations of a massacre at My Lai in March 1968, in which US soldiers killed hundreds of civilians, including children.

    Powell’s conclusion, that “in direct refutation of this portrayal, relations between American soldiers and the Vietnamese people are excellent”, flew in the face of growing evidence of brutal treatment of civilians by US forces.

    He was later accused of “whitewashing” the news of the massacre, details of which did not finally become public until 1970.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-33957894

    He sat in on meetings in which torture used in Iraq was discussed, in great detail, never objecting.

    He was behind Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, but only when his preferred position — a complete ban — was ruled out as a possibility, and he did so with incredibly homophobic logic.

    I think Iraq is a big enough stain on the careers to blot out everything else for everyone who led us to it — you don’t get to come back from lying us into war, especially not a war that long and big and destabilizing, or in participating in the decision to use torture — but Powell had plenty of others.Report

  2. Pinky says:

    Watching the comments on the Ten Second News article, I got the feeling that I was witnessing one of those bubble tests. I think there’s a fairly standard liberal and conservative take on what his greatest failing was, and if you’ve only read articles referring to WMD or only articles referring to his political slide, you’re too insulated. As usual, Trump merges both criticisms, makes it about himself, and delivers it with incredible crassness. Rather than popping a bubble, he puts a gold TRUMP sign on the side of it.Report

  3. J_A says:

    Unlike the author, based upon his performance in the political arena, I do not believe Powell would have been an effective president. His tenure at State showed that he wasn’t willing to stand up for his convictions (unless his convictions were similar to Cheney’s, which is actually quite possible)

    Though it might have been eight years of boring peace and prosperity, like it actually happened in the original timeline (thanks Bill C.!!), I doubt it would have been because of Powell. I suspect he would have deferred to/been pushed around by whoever ended in the Cabinet and upper echelons of a Powell administration. People that probably saw themselves as Powell’s “betters” (in intellect and political savviness, not necessarily in racial terms), and would not have taken a cue from him and pushed him around. And, again like it happened in real life, Powell would probably have let them do it, and accept being used as a prop.

    Not different, BTW, to what happened in the first Bush II period, before W finally got to courage to dismiss Rumsfeld, or the first half (the whole??) of the Trump administration, where most actual policies were farmed out to the Paul Ryan/Mitch McConnel wing of the GOP. Being President requires knowing how to control the machinery. Otherwise, the machinery will just do what they want

    On Trump’s statement, I won’t read it. There will be little about Powell, lots about Trump, and almost everything will be lies. Not worth burning electrons on itReport

  4. Susara Blommetjie says:

    “Don’t let adverse facts stand in the way of a good decision.”

    Well this one explains a lot.Report