Tomorrow’s Economic Headlines Today

Andrew Donaldson

Born and raised in West Virginia, Andrew has since lived and traveled around the world several times over. Though frequently writing about politics out of a sense of duty and love of country, most of the time he would prefer discussions on history, culture, occasionally nerding on aviation, and his amateur foodie tendencies. He can usually be found misspelling/misusing words on Twitter @four4thefire and his food writing website Yonder and Home. Andrew is the host of Heard Tell podcast. Subscribe to Andrew's Heard Tell SubStack for free here:

Related Post Roulette

17 Responses

  1. Saul Degraw says:

    The pandemic is finally showing the limits of just in time shipping which has dominanted stocking and logistics for the past 40 or so years. It also shows how the America First vaccination strategy has its downsides because countries like Vietnam might need until 2023 to get a proper vaccine supply for its citizens.

    Anecdata but I needed to rent a car yesterday to get from OC to Riverside for a depo. There were long lines to get your car because all the rental places were short staffed. They also told me it might be a 90 minute wait for my car but luckily a switch from a sedan to a mini-SUV made that not happen.Report

    • North in reply to Saul Degraw says:

      Yeah the pandemic devastated rental car fleets. In spring of 2020 Hertz bonds were selling for, like, five cents on the dollar. As the pandemic wound down the market realized “wait, holy fish, everyone will need rental cars when this ends” and the rental companies that had weathered the storm came roaring back but the rental fleets are thinned out a lot. If someone could have known it would have been a ridiculous return on that bond debt.

      As for America First vaccination strategy, let’s please not be idiots and try and pretend a democracy could have pursued any other approach with any hope of electoral survival.

      Just in time delivery is a conundrum. On one hand pandemics have played merry cain with them. On the other hand as long as there isn’t a pandemic they are a LOT cheaper than the old methods of inventory management. There really isn’t a moral lesson to be found here in my opinion.Report

      • Mike Schilling in reply to North says:

        As for America First vaccination strategy, let’s please not be idiots and try and pretend a democracy could have pursued any other approach with any hope of electoral survival.

        Same response to anyone who thinks Israel could just not respond to rockets fired from Gaza because they probably won’t hit anything important.Report

        • NOrtho in reply to Mike Schilling says:

          Agreed. And thanks to Sharon being clear sighted enough to drag Israel’s settler loons out of Gaza, over the howls of protest from the Israeli right, the Israelis can blast back when Hamas gets their jollies on and endures only yelps from the usual suspects.

          Younger me initially was pretty dismayed with Ari’el Sharon’s election but in hindsight the Israeli’s should probably carve his face on a cliffside somewhere. If that stroke hadn’t happened Israel would probably be in a much safer position today.Report

      • Saul Degraw in reply to North says:

        Cheap is not necessarily good. We need to get rid of the shareholder value/cheapest is best mentality.Report

        • North in reply to Saul Degraw says:

          *shrugs* Depends on the thing that’s cheap. Goods and services for the masses? Cheap is good. Try and buck that and you’re out of business. Supply lines? Cheap is good IF pandemics don’t become something more regular than a once in a century or so event; if they become more frequent then supply lines will thicken and prices will increase. Trying to weave morality into it doesn’t make much sense to me.Report

        • Brandon Berg in reply to Saul Degraw says:

          I guess you just really wanted to be mad at Milton Friedman for some reason, but due to competition, cost-cutting measures generally translate to lower costs for consumers rather than higher returns to shareholders. And lower costs are important for people who are less successful than we are. It’s kind of impressive that you managed to punch both up and down simultaneously with this comment.Report

        • Oscar Gordon in reply to Saul Degraw says:

          Concur, it’s not a moral question.

          Now, if you want to have a morality play, you could look at, say, a company raising it’s prices while claiming that the price increase is due to having to raise front line employee wages, while also increasing pay and bonuses for executives quite a bit. You perhaps could find an ethical/moral question or two in there.

          But I think most people would take lower cost over guaranteed supply, unless this becomes a chronic issue.Report

          • Saul Degraw in reply to Oscar Gordon says:

            I think you might be generally correct in your last sentence but I am not fully certain.

            One big moral or quasi-moral issue seems to be whether people view themselves as consumers first or as workers first. The answer is that people are both and it is complicated interplay but for many years, the official or semi-official narrative of policy and PR tried to revolve around having everyone see themselves as consumers first.

            What the pandemic seems to have done is ripped off the band-aid of those benefits in so many ways. White-collar workers found that commuting sucks and it is just as productive and more comfortable to work at home in comfy clothes. Junior I-bankers discovered it sucks to work super-long hours when it is not combined with the ability to blow off massive amounts of steam on Friday or Saturday night. In the case of summer camp cancelations and service work, a lot of people decided that the jobs just sucked and are not worth it. In the Times article, a few camp owners/managers were able to recognize that their camp counselors lives would suck because they would not have much to do during downtime because of COVID safety precautions and they were still experiencing psychological issues. Others were just complaining that they wanted employees to say “how high?” when they said jump.

            A lot of employers seem very rooted in old ways.Report

        • Slade the Leveller in reply to Saul Degraw says:

          As long as Wal-Mart and Amazon exist, we’re going to have to endure these things.Report

  2. Jaybird says:

    If we start having shortages of stuff at the same time that we start having inflation, we’re going to see a lot of interesting social dynamics that, if I guess correctly, will not be changed particularly by coordinated social shaming.Report

  3. Saul Degraw says:

    COVID also came for summer camp hard especially in terms of the traditionally low pay that summer camp offers: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/24/us/summer-camp-reopen-counselors.htmlReport

    • North in reply to Saul Degraw says:

      I hope Biden and the left constellation of politicians are quietly telling their teachers union allies “You’ve had your fun, it’s over now, you’re going back to teaching in person this fall or else.”Report

  4. Saul Degraw says:

    that’s a nice shot of the Port of Oakland and the Bay Bridge.Report

  5. Motoconomist says:

    Nice post Andrew. I concur.Report