- Next story HR 1 ‘For the People Act ’’ Passed In the House: Read It For Yourself
- Previous story Denmark, McDonald’s, and AOC: The US Is Not Other Countries, Part 55 Billion
Search
Ten Second News
In a landmark decision, a U.S. appeals court on Thursday rejected the 12-year quest of a Jeffrey Epstein survivor to hold the government accountable for giving the infamous child predator a clandestine deal that essentially allowed him to get out of jail after a minimal sentence, and, according to recent lawsuits, continue to abuse girls and women.
The 7-4 decision by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals was split mostly along gender lines, with four female judges issuing a scathing rebuke of the majority’s interpretation of the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA). The decision, unless it is overturned on further appeal, could allow wealthy defendants to continue to arrange favorable plea deals from the government without any oversight or accountability, said an attorney who originally filed the challenge.
“The ruling is very disturbing. It sets up two systems of justice, one for wealthy defendants who can negotiate deals before charges are filed — and one for most criminal defendants, who don’t have the wealth and power to arrange those kinds of deals,’’ said the attorney, Paul Cassell.
...
In her dissenting opinion, Senior Circuit Judge Frank Hull skewered the majority’s “sense of sorrow,’’ over not being able to give Epstein’s victims justice. Noting that the decision would have far-reaching impact in other cases involving wealthy defendants, she said the ruling “leaves federal prosecutors free to engage in the secret plea deals and deception’’ before criminal charges are ever made public, resulting in “the travesty” that happened in the Epstein case.
She also noted that “the Department of Justice’s failure to discipline its own prosecutors heightens the importance of the CVRA’s private right of action.’’
DOJ’s investigation found that prosecutors exercised “poor judgment,’’ but stopped short of recommending sanctions against prosecutors, including Alexander Acosta, the U.S. Attorney in Miami who approved the secret deal.
Acosta declined to comment on the ruling.
Featured image is "Pommes pourries - Rotten apples" by rore is licensed under CC BY 2.0)
Comment →Name of officer who shot Daunte Wright will be released "shortly," city manager says
From CNN's Maureen Chowdhury
Comment →Reporters pressed Brooklyn Center Mayor Mike Elliott and City Manager Curt Boganey about why the name of the officer who shot Daunte Wright has not been released.
Mayor Elliott said it was "privileged" information at the moment since the shooting is under investigation. He did express willingness to share additional information about the female officer in question.
Earlier in the news conference, Brooklyn Center Police Chief Tim Gannon said Wright was fatally shot during a traffic stop after a police officer shouted "Taser!" but fired a handgun instead of the non-lethal stun gun.
Ordinary Pivot
Features
Hot Posts
-
Shooting at Boulder Grocery Store Leaves 10 Dead
March 23, 2021
-
The Caron Nazario Video: Watch It For Yourself
April 10, 2021
-
Adam Toledo Shooting: Watch It For Yourself
April 16, 2021
-
A Good, Old Fashioned, All-American Satanic Panic
March 30, 2021
-
Pepe Le Pew Is Not A Role Model
April 4, 2021
-
April 6, 2021
-
Rep Matt Gaetz Had A No Good, Terrible, Very Bad Day
March 31, 2021
Subscribe to Blog via Email
Devcat Says

All should be well. Please report any problems you might see.
Recent Comments
InMD in reply to Stillwater
Ignoredon Linky Friday: ‘Cause Ain’t No Such Things As Halfway Crooks EditionThe ol' pay your burger flippers enough that they themselves can buy burgers from you too theory, eh?InMD in reply to Dark Matter
Ignoredon Adam Toledo Shooting: Watch It For YourselfDark, the problem is that what they think they're dealing with turns out to be wrong often enough that they sh…Dr X in reply to Slade the Leveller
Ignoredon Adam Toledo Shooting: Watch It For YourselfApart from all this, are you in favor of Lightfoot resigning? She'd be replaced by Tom Tunney until alderman e…Dark Matter in reply to InMD
Ignoredon Adam Toledo Shooting: Watch It For Yourselfit’s a false equivalence.Equivalence? It's the situation the cop thought he was in. The suspect was armed and…Stillwater in reply to Brandon Berg
Ignoredon Linky Friday: ‘Cause Ain’t No Such Things As Halfway Crooks EditionHere's where I get confused. Seems to me that higher wages for unskilled laborers increases the amount of disp…Dr X in reply to Slade the Leveller
Ignoredon Adam Toledo Shooting: Watch It For YourselfHighly critical generalizations about American policing and CPD--generalizations with which I agree-- must be…Chip Daniels in reply to Brandon Berg
Ignoredon Linky Friday: ‘Cause Ain’t No Such Things As Halfway Crooks EditionSo you're saying that the government is establishing a minimum floor on wages, and thereby forcing all busines…InMD in reply to Dark Matter
Ignoredon Adam Toledo Shooting: Watch It For YourselfNo one here was actually shooting at the police and it's a false equivalence. Starting from that hypothetical…
ICYMI
Ordinary Twitter

Huh, so “jitney” was slang for a nickel? Wonder how that relates to “jitney” as a (usually illegal/unlicensed) cab – were cab rides once a nickel?Report
I think he’s just using jitney as a slang for ‘piece of junk’. I.e “why are you wasting your time looking for that relatively worthless thing”Report
Yes. Jitney originally meant a nickel; buses and cabs were referred to as such because the fare was five cents.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/jitneyReport
huh, til.Report
Question the historical accuracy on this one; there’s not an onion in sight, much less on anyone’s belt.
(Though maybe because this is the buffalo nickel era not the bumblebee nickel one?)Report
We’ve seen jitney before, and, yes, it was at the pool hall.
So maybe it was a regionalism that the guy who moved there from (wherever) used unrepentantly?Report