American Pickers, Picking and Grinning

John McCumber

John McCumber is a cybersecurity executive, retired US Air Force officer, and former Cryptologic Fellow of the National Security Agency. In addition to his professional activities, John is a former Professorial Lecturer in Information Security at The George Washington University in Washington, DC and is currently a technical editor and columnist for Security Technology Executive magazine. John is the author of the textbook Assessing and Managing Security Risk in IT Systems: a Structured Methodology

Related Post Roulette

6 Responses

  1. Philip H says:

    My grandfather was something of the same way with office supplies. As kids it was FANTASTIC because he always had scrap paper and pencils and a plethora of other stuff that we could use when we visited to make whatever we wanted in his office. After a week there his office would be stuffed with drawings, glued up whatevers and laughter and love.

    When they moved to assisted living years later my dad and his siblings had dozens of unopened cases of pencils, reams of copier paper and the like to dispose of. The BOys and girls club and several local churches made out like bandits.Report

  2. Kolohe says:

    Both my wife and I come from families with hoarding tendencies; though since she saw it earlier and more extreme than I did, she’s able to fight it in our own home far more effectively than I can.Report

  3. Oscar Gordon says:

    With regards to reality shows, one I found on Netflix is “The Repair Shop”, where a bunch of artisans work together to restore antiques that have meaning to people.

    As for hoarding… yeah, my mom. Luckily she just hoarded paper (news clippings, greeting cards, letters, legal docs, notes she took about this or that). When she died, we kept the bonfire going all day with everything she had hoarded.Report

    • jason in reply to Oscar Gordon says:

      Yeah, I’m a fan of AP because it’s always interesting to hear the stories from people and find out about different products. And I’m always gobsmacked when they buy a rusty bicycle frame or part of a motorcycle for thousands of dollars (I understand the market reason, but it still shocks me).
      “The Repair Shop” is a great show. I need to find it outside of Netflix because we’ve watched all the episodes that were available.
      My gramps gathered quite a bit of stuff (but wasn’t a hoarder), but that was his depression upbringing–his family lived in a tent when he was 12 or so.Report

  4. DensityDuck says:

    That’s a really good point about, e.g., the Hummel figurines.

    People don’t want stuff anymore. The idea of “I have this whole series of things that exist mostly to be a whole series of things you can have” doesn’t excite people the way it used to; probably because the idea of there being things in general isn’t that special anymore. It used to be that if you had a lot of something, that was a big deal, because someone had to make all those things. But a weblog pointed out that Micro Machines, those tiny little car toys, were interesting mostly because it meant that production technology had advanced to the point where you could do details that fine, at scale, for children’s toys. It no longer represented a notable achievement to have a lot of items that looked interesting, because “items that looked interesting” were now just a commodity product.

    And, y’know. It’s not a bad thing that things worth having can now be had by anyone. But it does mean that there are basically no collectibles since the 1980s anymore. If something was made in a factory and you could buy it in a store (or at least at retail), it’s basically worth dirt. Literally the only person who’d want it was someone trying to jumpstart a collection from nothing, and that person usually already bought someone else’s stuff on eBay. (And even if you find someone who’s looking for just one piece, they usually are only looking for just one piece; they aren’t gonna buy your entire collection, and they certainly aren’t gonna pay higher than original retail.)

    Maybe Magic cards, but even those are mostly valuable as historical artifacts now; most anything old has been ruled unusable in officially-sanctioned gameplay, which is where the value of the cards really came from.Report

    • Richard Hershberger in reply to DensityDuck says:

      Counter-example: sneakers. This completely mystifies me, but my age is well above that market.

      More generally, what makes something “collectable” has nothing to do with its utility. It is the ineffable consensus of the market. Why is a first edition book worth more than a second edition? Because book collectors say so. And if the initial print run of the first edition had a typo on the fifth line of page 57, which got corrected for later print runs, the errant version is worth more and knowledgeable collectors will immediately turn to page 57 before making an offer. And if it is a book they actually want to read, they will buy a cheap “reading copy.”

      The kicker is that collectability requires limited supply. If a factory could just crank up production, it would simply be commonplace junk. It needs to be something that no one can make more of, or is manufactured by an outfit with the self-discipline to keep production runs artificially low. The the whims of the cultural consensus have to kick in, people agreeing that this sort of item is collectable, where another sort is just old junk. No one can predict what direction cultural whim will take. That is why all those baseball cards were thrown away, back in the day.Report