We Have Seen the Election Conspiracy, and It Is Us

Fish

Steve Fishburn is a Linux sys admin living in Colorado with two kids, two dogs, and a very patient and understanding wife. He can be found as Fish in the comments and is on the twitters as steven.fishburn

Related Post Roulette

27 Responses

  1. Jaybird says:

    Just like in 2016, it isn’t an election getting hacked: It’s us.

    The main thing I’m curious about is the extent to which we have already been hacked. How thirsty for new and novel and interesting content have we gotten over the last 4 years?

    How addicted to outrage are we? Where will we get our fix now?Report

    • Fish in reply to Jaybird says:

      College basketball.Report

    • JoeSal in reply to Jaybird says:

      The addiction is not to outrage, the addiction is the power of your team to rule others. If there was no power there would be no interest in it.

      From this all the sins grow like cancer. Power in the law, power in the courts, power in the executive. It’s back to the people who are nakedly will to power. There are no checks/balances to power, just what flavor in what branch is escalating at what time.

      The first amendment should have been: the right to be left alone from will to power people, if this right is violated people will shoot* you and your government.

      *substituting that whole ‘shall not be infringed’ non-sense for the flat out obvious reason it was includedReport

  2. Michaela M says:

    Excellent article!Report

  3. greginak says:

    Good stuff. For a lot of us this is strong win and we just want to relax. But the crazy pants stuff about a stolen election and from what i gather the typically petulant anger mongering speech by soon to be ex prez will lead to a a tense holiday season. And we’re still losing a thousand people a day to the Rona with cases spiking and trump is certain to spray shite all over the place so its gonna be a ride. Life aint’ getting any calmer soon.Report

    • Philip H in reply to greginak says:

      And come January 21st we will still have income inequality, police brutality, racism, misogyny, and the debt and deficit to deal with.

      The work is only just really beginning.Report

  4. Saul Degraw says:

    It sure seems like the Republican politicians and plutocrats are abandoning Trump very quickly.
    Plus the media, including Fox News, maybe not ONAN, was having none of his press conference. Anderson Cooper compared him to an obese turtle flailing on his back in the sun. NY Times gave a glowing compare and contrast to Biden on how he was handling the post-election count.Report

  5. greginak says:

    Comment in moderation i think. It was my best comment ever of course.Report

    • George Turner in reply to greginak says:

      Only the best comments end up in moderation. I think it’s so they can steal our ideas.

      Anyway, somehow my state can always count all the ballots in an hour, as can many other states. Other states are intentionally dysfunctional.

      Here’s a really good video from an election fraud lawyer. It’s long, but detailed.

      In the US, there are typically seven different badges, or indicia, that indicate that major election fraud is occurring, which is separate from proving it in court, which he also covers.

      * Did one area hold back a bunch of ballots until the rest of the state reports, and then produce however many ballots are needed to tip the election, which won’t be happening in non-battleground states. If a big urban center with a history of corruption is reporting late, it’s likely because they’re committing fraud.

      * Very late returns showing very different margins than early returns, and very different margins from similar demographic areas, or the same area earlier in the evening or in early voting. Was the area going 60-40, 55-45 and then at 4:00 AM it starts going 95-5? Generally this only happens if the later reports are based on fraud.

      * Is there a very large turnout in areas controlled or dominated by one party, without similarly large turnouts for that party in nearby cities with split control? Did one party has massive voter turnout in a particular demographic in cities controlled that party (machine), but normal turnout in other cities with split control (Detroit, Atlanta, Philly vs Ann Arbor, Savannah, Hershey)? If black turnout is breaking records in Atlanta, whereas blacks in Savannah are hardly bothering to vote, the machine-city turnout is likely fraudulent.

      * Areas that were showing below-average turnout until election day, short line on election day, and then days later claim very high vote counts from those areas. You see low turnout, and low interest, prior to or on election day, but then late that night record turnout seems to have occurred, without ever noticing it.

      * Ballots that only have one candidate marked, but not down ticket races. For example, tens of thousands of late ballots in Atlanta were for Biden, but the “voter” didn’t bother to vote for the Democrat Senate candidate. Does this just happen in contested states, but not uncontested states? Is this happening on ballots marked for the other candidate, or just one?

      * Is there a very large apparent turnout in cities in key states that does not occur in similar cities in other states. Is there a massive wave of urban blacks voting in Detroit, when there was no massive wave in cities like Cleveland or St Louis?

      * Are there attempts to keep the counting from being watched and monitored? Is counting happening in the middle of the night, without any observers present?

      ALL of these indicia are glaringly present in Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, and somewhat apparent in North Carolina, and to a degree in Pennsylvania and Nevada. These are the historically typical warning signs of ongoing, significant voting fraud in US elections.

      Then he goes through the legal path that these cases follow, what evidence you need, what checks exist, etc., and the various legal remedies.Report

      • Oscar Gordon in reply to George Turner says:

        Freiheit is not an election fraud lawyer, he’s a Canadian attorney with a background in commercial law and litigation. And he’s not even (AFAICT) even practicing law anymore, being a full time vlogger.

        He may be right, but you are going to need a more authoritative source.Report

        • Philip H in reply to Oscar Gordon says:

          it would also help to have an American election lawyer . .

          Which reminds me – @George when while Dunham be dropping those Obama administration indictments? The ones you have been telling us for four years were about to happen? Seems to me his window is closing rather rapidly.Report

    • Aristotle approves of it.Report

  6. This is a wonderful piece. I wish you wrote for us more often.Report

  7. SableMartlet says:

    FISH = NERD. But seriously, accurate take on what’s going on.Report

  8. Damon says:

    Antifa turns turns against Newson, Biden and Harris.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3I4dXbhHXs&ab_channel=C-SPAN

    *caugh* Ernst Röhm

    Be careful what you loose upon the world.Report

  9. Pinky says:

    I’m with most of this article, but I don’t see the connection where it blamed Trump.Report

  10. The thing is, the vote is never/has never/will never be completely counted on election day. That’s a fiction spread by the Trump administration

    That’s 100% accurate.Report