- Next story Apologia of Human Nature: Charlatans, Saints, Hoffer, and Burt Likko’s Query
- Previous story The People’s Court: Live-streaming the Supreme Court
Search
TEN SECOND BUZZ
- Sam Bankman-Fried Gets 25 Year Prison SentenceMarch 28, 2024No Comments
- Vote for Show, Earmarks For DoughMarch 28, 2024No Comments
- Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore Struck By Container Ship, CollapsesMarch 26, 202451 Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 3/25/2024March 25, 2024211 Comments
- From CNBC: Trump Fraud Bond Cut to $175 Million in Appeal RulingMarch 25, 20242 Comments
Features
Hot Posts
A Message From Devcat
We have been experiencing some system resource issues. We believe the problem may be resolved, but if it is not please bear with us.
Recent Comments
- Jaybird in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 3/25/2024The NYPD has tweeted that they've arrested the guy again. pic.twitter.com/0oBRaqSZv0— NYPD NEW…
- North in reply to J_A on Bridge Derangement SyndromeThank you J_A, I suspected something along those lines would be the case just the same way most home…
- J_A in reply to Jaybird on Bridge Derangement SyndromeYou are for sure at least partially right. I’ve only been involved in one such claim, and we the con…
- Chip Daniels on Bridge Derangement SyndromeI'm going to go way out on a limb here and suggest it was a cascading series of failures because thi…
- J_A in reply to Jaybird on Bridge Derangement SyndromeAll vessels that I know are owned by companies that ONLY own that vessel, so any liability and risk…
- J_A in reply to North on Bridge Derangement SyndromeAll vessels that I know are owned by companies that ONLY own that vessel, so any liability and risk…
- Pinky in reply to Jaybird on Bridge Derangement SyndromeOf course I wouldn't be stunned to find out that someone made mistakes.
- Jaybird in reply to Pinky on Bridge Derangement SyndromeEh, here's from The Daily Mail talking about a CNN interview with someone there: The Dali cargo ship…
- Jaybird in reply to North on Bridge Derangement SyndromeFrom what I've read, according to Maritime Law, the people shipping stuff are on the hook. The owner…
- Koz in reply to InMD on Open Mic for the week of 3/25/2024Hell, Israeli security isn’t relevant to American security or any other interest. They’re a proxy no…
Comics
-
March 29, 2024
-
March 28, 2024
-
March 27, 2024
-
March 26, 2024
More Comments
- Michael Cain in reply to J_A on Bridge Derangement Syndrome
- North in reply to J_A on Bridge Derangement Syndrome
- J_A in reply to CJColucci on Bridge Derangement Syndrome
- CJColucci in reply to J_A on Bridge Derangement Syndrome
- InMD in reply to Koz on Open Mic for the week of 3/25/2024
- Koz in reply to InMD on Open Mic for the week of 3/25/2024
- Andrew Donaldson in reply to Jaybird on Bridge Derangement Syndrome
- Pinky in reply to Jaybird on Bridge Derangement Syndrome
- J_A on Bridge Derangement Syndrome
- Burt Likko on Sports Betting Opponents Try Mopping Water Off Legalized Gambling Beachhead
- Burt Likko on Bridge Derangement Syndrome
- Jaybird on Bridge Derangement Syndrome
- North in reply to Chris on Open Mic for the week of 3/25/2024
- Michael Cain in reply to Jaybird on Bridge Derangement Syndrome
- Greg In Ak in reply to Jaybird on Bridge Derangement Syndrome
“You’re not always going to have an encyclopedia in your pocket.”Report
This has become a problem in a lot of disciplines and is probably worthy of a post. Much of the final testing in post-graduate work is complicated memory exercises. No one does actual work under the conditions of a bar exam, or a typical Ph.D. field exam. Calc I got me thinking the last time I taught it. In real life, a person can access Mathematica (or similar) software on their phone from anywhere in the world, and the software is enormously better at indefinite integrals than any human. Why does Calc I put such an emphasis on doing indefinite integrals by hand?Report
Why should someone who’s been through a Calc I course not be capable of doing indefinite integrals by hand?Report
It depends on the integral. I expect any decent STEM student should be able to integrate polynomials in their head. I expect them to understand how to juggle a few sines, cosines, and the exponential. That stuff is foundational. You shouldn’t need Mathematica for that — although as your formula grow, the advantage of software is you won’t make minor mistakes. It turns out Mathematica will never screw up signs. That’s a pretty big advantage.
That said, I wouldn’t drop something like the Dirichlet integral on someone without preparing them for that specific problem. It’s rather non-trivial: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_integralReport
Supposed it’s not that way — integrals for polynomials, trig, and exponentials aren’t pounded into their heads. More emphasis on setting up and much less on solving. Applications like sketching the shape of functions using derivatives is tossed entirely. Go beyond the venerable TI-83 and use Mathematica or similar. Where do the students with a $100 device in their pockets suffer from not being able to do it on paper?Report
That’s a good question.
First, I’m not a professional educator, so I’m just kind of speculating here. There are people who research these kinds of questions as their job, so maybe I’m wrong.
I’ll say this, if you’re reading through a journal article, and you have to fire up your symbolic integration engine every time you see a basic integral, that is a kind of “cognitive load.” By contrast, if you just “see” the solution, without having to think much, then you’ll be able to hold more of the “higher level” concepts in your head at once.
For example, if you show me a weird double integral that includes the sinc function, multiplied by some other function — well if I’ve played with those integrals enough I might recognize that sinc behaves like a delta function, and what I’m seeing is a kind of Fourier transform.
Or I can just put it into Mathematica and it will spit out some answer with no obvious connection to the formula I put in, because there is a very weird path from sinc to delta to Fourier.
So now I’m thinking, “What the fuck? Why does that work?” By contrast, I could be thinking, “Oh yeah, that a delta function. Okay, now what are they doing with it?”
In theory, an instructor can show students how the delta function works, and how it leads to the Fourier transform. However, will they remember it? Will it get “baked in”?
Speaking for myself, I remember topics better when I’ve actually had to do hard problems, compared to ones I only saw briefly in lecture.
Moreover, I suspect there is a great deal of value in learning to “juggle layered, complex, abstract ideas.” It’s something that requires practice. It doesn’t just happen by magic. It takes work.
I’m sure there are many specific abstract tasks that one could use to train such mental faculties, but symbolic calculus is a pretty good one. We have a lot of experience teaching it. It’s useful in a lot of fields.
(That said, proving binomial identities, just to pick a random example, also exercises those “thinking muscles”, and is perhaps more useful in compsci. I’m open to many ideas.)
One might say that students can learn these skills by “juggling” the “layered, complex, abstract ideas” from their particular domain, rather than pure math. Perhaps. I don’t know. I think it depends on the domain. Physics — yeah probably. Economics — OMG yikes.
I have an analogy. When learning piano, you learn scales. Lots of scales. However, you don’t simply play scales in actual music. You do other stuff. I suspect, nevertheless, there is still value in drilling scales. I think “pure symbolic math” might play a similar role. It’s building a foundation of abstract problem solving that will be useful in any technical field.
That said, I also think graphical calculator are god-tier awesome. Moreover, I see Mathematica is a brain-force-multiplier. I’m very pro-tools.
I want both the “drilling basics” and the leveraging of awesome tools. Each has their place.Report
“Supposed it’s not that way — integrals for polynomials, trig, and exponentials aren’t pounded into their heads.”
Why should we expect that Calc I should not be that way?
What’s the point of Calc I, if not to be that way?Report
There’s definitely a post in there.
The Red Queen shows up in it.Report
The thing that gets to me about this final exam is that it is asking for the student to regurgitate trivia rather than solve problems or do any analysis. Memorizing trivia can be a big pain but it isn’t really a mark of intelligence or that you mastered the subject. A test should show that you can solve problems or analyze the facts.Report