For Your Consideration: A Preview Of The 92nd Academy Awards

Luis A. Mendez

Luis A. Mendez

Published Author Of Both Fiction And Non-Fiction - Dealing In Fantastical Tales, Film Criticism, And US/UK Psephology

Related Post Roulette

5 Responses

  1. Avatar Jaybird says:

    One of the big criticisms I see of the Oscars (among the dozens of big criticisms I see of it) is that the Academy confuses “Most Acting” with “Best Acting”. So you get stuff like Leo winning for The Revenant. They used this criticism against The Joker and… yeah, I guess I can see that. But much of the abundance of acting was good, in addition to merely being abundant.

    (As for Best Picture, I’m still confused by The Artist winning. What the hell? How narcissistic is that?)Report

  2. I honestly hate years like this because we are so spoiled for choice with great movies, no matter what some really deserving people are going to get the shaft. And then in other years they’re handing out awards where we’re all like “yeah ok whatever”.

    It really makes the whole thing an exercise in futility, and I think that’s one of the main reasons people have tuned out.Report

  3. Avatar Rufus F. says:

    I’ve only seen three of them: The Irishman, Once Upon a Time…, and Parasite. Of the three, Parasite was the best constructed story and was just a neat little Hitchcockian thriller. I wasn’t as enamored as the critics were with it’s “satirical” elements, which seemed a little obvious. But it was still the best of the three for my money. It won’t win best picture, though. Let’s be honest- the best foreign language Oscar is for movies like Parasite.Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *