Devin Nunes and the Very Delicate Feelings

Avatar

Michael Siegel

Michael Siegel is an astronomer living in Pennsylvania. He is on Twitter, blogs at his own site, and has written a novel.

Related Post Roulette

28 Responses

  1. Avatar Saul Degraw
    Ignored
    says:

    “But Nunes is a public figure, as you may have herd. So if he wants to milk this situation for a big judgement”

    ISWYDT!!!Report

  2. Avatar Mike Schilling
    Ignored
    says:

    I went and sued the maximum our insane laws allow
    Two news networks, seven farmers, and a cowReport

  3. Avatar Mike Schilling
    Ignored
    says:

    Nunes’ beef is that he can prove that the CNN story was inaccurate based on his travel records.

    Or his dairy.Report

  4. Avatar Mike Schilling
    Ignored
    says:

    And one serious point: venue shopping. Many (all?) of these lawsuits were filed in Virginia, specifically because it doesn’t have anti-SLAPP laws.Report

  5. Avatar JoeSal
    Ignored
    says:

    Latest story on CNN:

    Herd it from a friend who…
    Herd it from a friend who….
    Herd it from another ewe been messin’ aroundReport

  6. Avatar Philip H
    Ignored
    says:

    On a serious note – Snowflake much Mr. Nunes?Report

  7. Avatar Oscar Gordon
    Ignored
    says:

    I just knew the puns would flow like the milk of heaven.Report

  8. Avatar pillsy
    Ignored
    says:

    Nunes has a long history of hoof in mouth disease.Report

  9. Avatar PD Shaw
    Ignored
    says:

    No doubt, I’m off on the wrong hoof with my personal ewes, but I think NY Times v. Sullivan is a case of baaaa facts making baaaa law, and should be hauled to the slaughterhouse for rendering.Report

    • Avatar Michael Siegel
      Ignored
      says:

      I disagree. With public figures, there is a critical interest in exposing corruption and malfeasance. Moreover, such figures have immense power at their disposal to kill stories they don’t like. It’s already bad enough with SLAAP lawsuits. I think requiring actual malice is a good balance to that.

      To give a counter-example, I thought Sarah Palin was entirely justified in suing the NYT for claiming her “target map” led to the Giffords shooting. The information was known to be wrong, they responded with a half-assed correction and stood by it until someone pointed out that it was defamation. I think that meets a reckless disregard for the truth standard.Report

      • Avatar PD Shaw
        Ignored
        says:

        What the decision does is protect untrue statements in the public sphere. There is no public value in untrue statements; the argument is that the news media needs to be able to make mistakes in order to report the truth. Sometimes these mistakes are characterized as “innocent.” There is a lot of space between innocent and malicious, which is where most liability is triggered. There are different rules of law that could be used and the actual malice standard is particularly novel. The news media has become less reliable since 1964, and some part of that is that the news was relieved of previous obligations.Report

  10. Avatar Charles Wagner
    Ignored
    says:

    Will I be sued if I point out that Devin Nunes’s cow is as fictitious as most of what comes out of his mouth?Report

  11. Avatar Daewin
    Ignored
    says:

    The Land of Milk and Money. Or is it the Land of Milkin’ MoneyReport

  12. Avatar nelson
    Ignored
    says:

    I hope Devin Nunes kicks their no good butts.
    Too much bullshit from cnnReport

  13. Avatar Katie
    Ignored
    says:

    So his he in cahoots with Trump who is also the king of Lawsuits?Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *