- Next story The Spanish Civil War: A Product of Appeasement
- Previous story Jury Finds Amber Guyger Guilty
Search
TEN SECOND BUZZ
- The FTC has banned (nearly all) non-compete agreementsApril 23, 202418 Comments
- More Campus Palestine Protests, More Arrests, More Viral VideoApril 23, 202417 Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 4/22/2024April 22, 202439 Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024April 15, 2024232 Comments
- OJ Simpson: Football Great, Murder Suspect, and Convicted Felon, Dead at 76April 11, 2024115 Comments
Features
Hot Posts
A Message From Devcat
We have been experiencing some system resource issues. We believe the problem may be resolved, but if it is not please bear with us.
Recent Comments
- Saul Degraw on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassJohn Ganz has a good look at the complicated history of the Mizrahi in Israel: https://www.unpopular…
- Dark Matter in reply to DavidTC on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassIsrael lay siege to a hospital for weeks. That was reported with no mention of who they were fightin…
- Saul Degraw on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassAgain, lets look at the fact that multiple things can be true and that motivated reasoning tends to…
- Chip Daniels in reply to DavidTC on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassThis is just the same argument both sides have repeated endlessly. "Look at our oppression! Behold o…
- Chip Daniels in reply to DensityDuck on The Shifting Politics of AbortionAll laws are by necessity vague statements intended to be clarified by bureaucratic rule or court op…
- CJColucci on The Shifting Politics of AbortionWhen it comes to abortion, I understand the sentiment that says that it should be avoided. But that…
- DensityDuck in reply to Jaybird on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harassi-dont-want-a-solution-i-want-to-be-mad-dot-jpeg
- DensityDuck in reply to Jaybird on The Shifting Politics of AbortionThe issue, to me, is that a lot of people have the idea that laws aren't rules, they're position sta…
- InMD in reply to Michael Siegel on The Shifting Politics of AbortionPersonally I think there was a lot of complacency that the worst that was going to happen was a Robe…
- Michael Siegel in reply to DensityDuck on The Shifting Politics of AbortionI agree partially but ... once Kennedy retired, it became obvious Roe was in danger, if not doomed.…
Comics
-
April 24, 2024
-
April 23, 2024
-
Friend Husband At The Ballpark
April 22, 2024
-
Good Morning! Are You An Amateur?
April 21, 2024
More Comments
- Jaybird on The Shifting Politics of Abortion
- LeeEsq in reply to Dark Matter on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- LeeEsq in reply to Dark Matter on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- InMD in reply to KenB on The Shifting Politics of Abortion
- Jaybird in reply to DavidTC on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- DavidTC in reply to Dark Matter on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- DavidTC in reply to Chris on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- North in reply to Dark Matter on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- Dark Matter in reply to Chris on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- Saul Degraw on Open Mic for the week of 4/22/2024
- Dark Matter in reply to LeeEsq on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- KenB in reply to InMD on The Shifting Politics of Abortion
- Jaybird in reply to Chris on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- LeeEsq in reply to Jaybird on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
- InMD in reply to KenB on The Shifting Politics of Abortion
Just for fun, I plugged this into an inflation calculator here.
33 cents in 1916 (I am guessing from the ’16 on the cartoon it was drawn in that year) would be equivalent to almost $8 today. Granted, I don’t know how sugar prices have fluctuated vs. general inflation, but $8 is a pretty nice box of the typical candy sold at groceries or drugstores (think Russel Stover)Report
33 cents seems like a lot. Just googling around a bit, penny candies were a thing in 1916: “‘Penny candy’ encompassed a broad range of confection. Established and large-scale manufacturers who produced many higher priced goods also sold bulk candies designed to appeal to children and to be sold so many pieces to the penny. These might included molded hard or soft candies, suckers, licorice in all sorts of shapes, marshmallows, or caramels, and would be distributed by ‘jobbers’ to various retail stores. At the other extreme, such penny candies might also be manufactured by hand in small ‘candy kitchens’ and sold in local shops or from street carts. The conditions of manufacture, and the quality of ingredients, might therefore vary significantly. Especially at the lower rungs of the trade, ‘adulterants’ such as artificial dyes and non-food fillers were occasionally used to make candy look more appealing or to lower the price of production.”
The bulk of this piece is about the panic that emerged from a 1916 polio epidemic, which resulted in wrapping of candies on which brands could be promoted.
https://candyprofessor.com/candy-bibliography-library/polio-and-childrens-candy-around-1916/Report