Search
TEN SECOND BUZZ
- Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024April 15, 2024193 Comments
- OJ Simpson: Football Great, Murder Suspect, and Convicted Felon, Dead at 76April 11, 2024115 Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 4/8/2024April 8, 2024158 Comments
- Open Mic for the week of 4/1/2024April 1, 2024357 Comments
- Sam Bankman-Fried Gets 25 Year Prison SentenceMarch 28, 202434 Comments
Features
Hot Posts
A Message From Devcat
We have been experiencing some system resource issues. We believe the problem may be resolved, but if it is not please bear with us.
Recent Comments
- Philip H in reply to Pinky on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024I have yet to see a person pitch a tantrum, for altruistic reasons.
- Philip H in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024I will repeat that his criticism is a lack of conservative voices in the news room - meaning among h…
- Chip Daniels on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024Life under Republican rule: WASHINGTON (AP) — One woman miscarried in the lobby restroom of a Texas…
- Chip Daniels in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024I think I'm dealing with someone like that right now. Like, you ask Phillip if he is capable of seei…
- Jaybird in reply to Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024You assume because I didn’t agree with his perspective, and don’t agree with his conclusions I don’t…
- Philip H in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024Ah yes, we are back to your theory of the mind discussions. You assume because I didn't agree with h…
- Jaybird in reply to Chip Daniels on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024Now try to imagine someone who can only see one perspective. To the point where others DON'T EVEN OC…
- Chip Daniels in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024Wait wait wait. You mean other people see things differently than you do? How can they be so blind!
- Pinky in reply to Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024Selfishness can lead to a tantrum, just like an interstate can lead to a mall. Mall doesn't imply in…
- Pinky in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024If you can duplicate the internal structure of something, it's very likely you understand its intern…
Comics
-
Planning The Annual Trip Around The World
April 19, 2024
-
April 18, 2024
-
April 17, 2024
-
April 16, 2024
More Comments
- Jaybird in reply to Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- Philip H in reply to Pinky on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- Jaybird in reply to Pinky on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- Philip H in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- Pinky in reply to Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- Pinky in reply to Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- Jaybird on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching Up
- Marchmaine on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching Up
- Jaybird in reply to Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- Philip H in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- Jaybird in reply to Philip H on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- Jaybird in reply to Chip Daniels on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- DavidTC on Embassies, Attacks, and Iran
- Philip H in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- Chip Daniels in reply to Jaybird on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
Is there a term for an unreliable narrator, but on a moral dimension? That is, an author telling a story from a point of view where that point of view is the ‘hero’ of the story, but he’s actually not – and that’s exactly the author’s intent (as opposed to accident, or mistake)?
I happened to be thinking about that today, reading Ursula LeGuin’s Left Hand of Darkeness, with respect to gender fluidity and the outside observers in the story making comments on it – which by today’s standards could be ‘problematic’. But I’m wondering if that was Le Guin’s point, even in 1969. (though the newer intro, written about 10 years later, doesn’t really lend itself to that interpertation)
Anyway, thinking about that again, with this one, which again, has the dude flying off the handle at his wife due to the frustations of his day. Is it at all possible that Briggs is making this guy ‘the bad guy’? Or is it just straight up an embrace of the 1920s version of toxc masculinty?
(weirdly enough, Cosmo Kramer would wear that same coat 70 years later, but fully own the look – and yet fly off the handle very inappropriately for a complete different reason)Report
I read it as being somewhere in between the two. The guy doing this isn’t Good, though is kind of too easily forgiven.
The analogy I would use is the doofus dad in a family sitcom who spends the entire episode trying to cover for having forgotten his anniversary. There is, I think, a consensus around the idea that forgetting the anniversary is bad. That, if we’re thinking about it, it reflects badly on him that he did. That if she’s mad, she’s pretty justified in being mad. Maybe we’re hoping he gets caught or maybe we’re hoping he gets away with it because, even though he did this thing he shouldn’t have, we’re sympathetic to the character in the overall and this particular thing doesn’t persuade us not to be. (And even if we want justice to prevail and him to get caught, we are likely to hope he doesn’t get into too much trouble.)
That’s sort of where I see this, except with the bond to the male character being weaker since the characters in these don’t repeat and we have no relationship. The guy in this comic is portrayed as kind of a loser-for-a-day and I think verbally ripping into his wife actually furthers that portrayal. It goes from a bad day to a worse day, because now he’s dragging other people and yelling at women is something you’re Not Supposed To Do. There is a sort of “This type of behavior is inevitable because men will be men” aspect, but the men doing it are not enviable and are (at least for the day) losing at life.Report