Thursday Throughput

This week is the winter meeting of the American Astronomical Society, so there is a lot of astronomy in the news. Let’s get going!

[ThTh1] China recently landed a probe on the far side of the moon. One thing that annoys me is people conflating the far side of the moon with the “dark side”. These are not the same thing. The moon is tidally locked to the Earth, which means it rotates once every time it revolves. So it has one side that always faces us and one side that always faces away. The dark side changes as the moon moves, with a “day” on the moon lasting about 28 Earth days. Anytime you see the moon at less than full, you are seeing the dark side of the moon in the part that isn’t glowing (although in really dark skies, you can sometimes see the dark side because of the reflected Earth shine).

[ThTh2] The Curiosity probe continues to dazzle over six years into its two year mission.

[ThTh3] In other Mars news, NASA is slowly giving up hope on talking to Opportunity ever again. We shouldn’t feel too bad. We got over 5000 days of science out of a mission that was supposed to go 90. XKCD has published some great comics on both Opportunity and its sister mission Spirit.

[ThTh4] Yes, yes, still MORE Mars news. InSight has now deployed its seismometer.

[ThTh5] The Hubble Space Telescope has produced a spectacular image of the nearby M33 galaxy that is 665 *million* pixels in size. For an astronomer who studies stars and nearby galaxies, this is a treat. Download the full gigantic 1.6 gigabyte image here.

[ThTh6] Oh, and we were able to measure light echoes around a black hole.

[ThTh7] And TESS is already finding new planets.

[ThTh8] Fast Radio Bursts are one of the big topics in astronomy right now and we’re still trying to figure out what they are. This week, we were told about a a huge number of them, including the second repeating burst.

[ThTh9] I hope to get a chance to write a longer piece on the visit to Ultima Thule. For now, just enjoy the sight of the most distant object visited by human machines.

Thursday Throughput

The Ultima Thule asteroid. Credit: NASA

[ThTh10] A couple of years ago, I wrote a blog post arguing that the idea of “Rationalia”, a society run on scientific evidence, was a bad idea. This week, I threw out a short story connected with it. Not my best work, to be honest, but I’ve gotten tired of the recent barrage of articles pretending a technocracy would be a good idea.

[ThTh11] As I was finishing this up, news broke that Gustav Tammann died. Tammann, along with the late Allan Sandage, did some of the fundamental work on the Hubble Constant — the parameter that measures how fast our universe is expanding and, by extrapolation, how old it is. When he began, the measurements indicated the universe was ridiculously young — younger than the stars within it. Thanks to the work of him and many other brilliant people, that measurement came down to the point where the age of the universe and the age of the stars are consistent. Read the thread for more about him.

Home Page Twitter 

Michael Siegel is an astronomer living in Pennsylvania. He is on Twitter, blogs at his own site, and has written a novel.

Please do be so kind as to share this post.

5 thoughts on “Thursday Throughput

  1. I’ve always taken “dark” to be metaphorical. Until relatively recently, we had no idea what was on the other side (more of the same, of course, but specifically), so it was a mystery. We knew it existed, but not the details. Like dark matter, dark energy, dark money, the Dark Ages, the Dark Continent, a dark horse, etc.


  2. The problem I see with a decent amount of “Rationalia” advocacy is that it tends to be pretty shallow. Perhaps because the bulk of its advocates are physical scientists they aren’t used to dealing with concepts like the is-ought gap and the diversity of human preferences.

    I think there’s a lot of scope to make our government more rational though. Not just in taking facts more seriously (which as you note is a bipartisan problem), but in doing a better job of testing whether policies are working as they were originally intended (if your government is like mine you already have employees with the right skills who’d be thrilled to help).

    Also a rational government would be one that used a rational framework for addressing policy problems, such as Market Failure Economics.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *