Featured Post

The Right To Choose: Obria Competing With Planned Parenthood May Be A Game Changer For Politics.

The Right To Choose: Obria Competing With Planned Parenthood May Be A Game Changer For Politics.

In political warfare, crafting a streamlined narrative to change the perception of any cultural belief is unquestionable power. Whether it’s used to reinforce religious ideology or plain common sense, once it strikes at the heart of Middle America, politicians always run with it. And like opening Pandora’s box, there’s no closing it once the philosophy evolves over a period of time.

Roe v. Wade is a prime example.

For decades, lawmakers on Capitol Hill refused to give a definitive answer on the abortion argument except using the catch phrase, “I am pro-life but believe in a woman’s right to choose.” In 2015, Gallup released a poll  stating 50% of Americans believe abortion should be legal “only under certain circumstances,” like rape, incest or regarding the health of the mother.  Congress’ choice to fund Planned Parenthood with Title X funding  left the pro-life movement feeling angry, disgusted, and mobilized to elect any politician vowing to reverse Roe v. Wade, and defund Planned Parenthood.

Enter the Donald Trump Presidency.

According to this quote, the incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi doesn’t realize the irony of her own words. ”You know what, that’s why Donald Trump is President of the United States—the Evangelicals, and the Catholics, anti-marriage equality, anti-choice. That’s how he got to be president, and everything was trumped literally and figuratively after that.” The pro-life movement is a caveat to Pelosi’s speakership, because abortion is a moral issue no matter who is in office. And regardless of Democrats’ pledge to protect a woman’s right to choose, their own words may come back to haunt them. I Stand with PP says, 60% of Planned Parenthood patients rely on public health programs like Medicaid, and Title X for their preventative and primary care. “So,” the argument goes, “when you hear extreme politicians talking about defunding Planned Parenthood, they really mean blocking patients who rely on public healthcare programs from getting their care at Planned Parenthood.”

Challenge accepted.

Like Planned Parenthood, Obria Medical Clinics want Medicaid and Title X funding from the Trump Administration to protect Womens’ healthcare, and aim to give birth to a game-changing political narrative for the pro-life movement, and a newly pro-choice-controlled Congress. The right to choose now holds a brand new meaning.

Why this works: Statistical data supports Obria’s argument for government assistance. The Centers For Disease Control  states that in 2015, the number of abortions performed in the U.S. declined over a decade. The reason: Teen abstinence and birth control. Only 188 abortions were recorded per 1000 live births in comparison to 233 per 1000 in 2005.

The culture is changing.

For decades, Planned Parenthood’s argument for federal funding has been to protect women and men’s healthcare for low-income families such as cancer screenings, birth control, pregnancy counseling services, and STD/HIV testing. Although the Hyde Amendment bars any federal funding for abortion, Planned Parenthood can apply their tax revenue for cost procedures, exempting other subsidies for abortion services. This loophole in the law affords lawmakers, including Republicans, a safety net to ricochet from any pro-choice argument—until now.

In 2006, Kathleen Eaton Bravo took her California Birth Choice Pregnancy Resource Centers, and turned them into functional medical clinics, serving women and men. By 2009, Obria treated over 9000 patients a year. “We went from saving four babies a year to almost 1000, in 2014.” Bravo regrets her decision to have an abortion, and now carries the mantle for the pro-life movement and Catholics with her healthier choice for women. “We’ve been reactive in the pro-life movement for 40 years,” she said. “Let’s be pro-active and go to the root of the problem.”

Minus Planned Parenthood’s abortion services and HIV testing, Obria offers similar healthcare options along with free ultrasounds, and non-hormonal contraception. By using a franchise model to market their clinics, Obria becomes healthy competition for Planned Parenthood, and political dynamite for lawmakers married to the pro-choice narrative. “A woman needs choice, but you can’t have a choice if the only clinic that a woman can go to is Planned, Parenthood,” argues Bravo.

For Evangelical Republicans, their unholy coalition with the Trump presidency to secure a conservative U.S. Supreme Court came to pass with Justice Brett Kavanaugh now on the bench. But even with Republicans controlling all three branches of government, they still cannot overturn Roe v. Wade. Planned Parenthood just received Title X funding again, from the outgoing Republican Congress. This weakens their narrative that electing Republicans secures the pro-life movement. At best, the court reversing Roe v. Wade sends the decision back to the states, ending any probability of removing it from law. Keep in mind that abortion is a politician’s wedge issue to secure re-election by accepting campaign donations from pro-choice and pro-life action fund organization.

Outgoing Republican Governor John Kasich of Ohio disappointed millions in the pro-life wing by vetoing the recent “Heartbeat” bill. His decision met a challenge in the Ohio legislature, then encountered defeat with just a single vote in the senate. Kasich then angered pro-choice advocates by signing into law senate bill 145 outlawing dilation and extraction abortions instead. With such a deal breaker for pro-life and pro-choice voters, Kasich, weighing a presidential challenge in 2020, is showing no loyalty to either side of the abortion issue, clearly gambling on the moderate swing vote. Will it be enough? While abortion is declining overall, in 2016 Ohio saw an increase by a percentage point.

On the flip-side, incoming pro-choice Speaker Nancy Pelosi is now on record for inviting pro-life Democrats to return to the liberal tent, in spite of DNC Chairman Tom Perez’ blistering proclamation that, “every Democrat should support abortion rights.” Public support for Obria pro-life medical clinics could force both Democrats and Republicans to reexamine their party platforms, because the all-or-nothing narrative isn’t winning over the hearts and minds of Middle America. Perhaps empathizing with repentant women like Bravo changes the current dialogue in Washington.

Her mission appears to be paying off. In 2014, Guttmacher Institute reported that the abortion rate fell to its lowest since Roe v. Wade, averaging 14.6 abortions per 1000 women ages 15–44 compared to 16.3 in 1973. Norma McCorvey, who was “Jane Roe” but later became a pro-life advocate, died in 2017 due to heart failure; she was 69 years old. She suggested a heart-felt, game changing narrative that may forever set the tone in solving the pro-choice debate: “The answer to the abortion problem is forgiveness, repentance, and love.” Politicians running for 2020 should run with it.

Guest Author
Home Page Twitter 

I'm just a simple story maker longing to make the world a better place, while butterflies dance inside my head.

Please do be so kind as to share this post.

11 thoughts on “The Right To Choose: Obria Competing With Planned Parenthood May Be A Game Changer For Politics.

  1. “A woman needs choice, but you can’t have a choice if the only clinic that a woman can go to is Planned, Parenthood,”

    What the heck is that supposed to mean? Women need not only the right to choose whether or not to have an abortion, but the right to choose whether to recurve healthcare from a provider that respects or does not respect their right to choose whether or not to have an abortion?

    If that’s not the most nonsensical thing I’m likely to read all day, i shall be very disappointed in whoever tops it.

    Does my right to choose whether or not to get a tooth extracted also require the existence of dental clinics that refuse to do extractions for any of their patients? By this logic, yes it does.


  2. The abortion rate is almost surely dropping at least in part because of much better access to contraception, which allows women more opportunity to choose when they do and do not become pregnant. Obria denies contraception services – it offers non-hormonal contraception, but nothing else – which means that it is risking the demand for abortion services increasing. Which gets back to the original issue of Planned Parenthood being the facility that provides healthcare for women, and its “competitors” not only not doing that fully, but risking making worse the problem they’ve have publicly claimed to want to fix. The implication is that operations like Obria have something else going on.


    • That’s my biggest concern here with Obria. I did some reading, and they won’t even supply condoms. The only “birth control” they offer is counseling on “natural family planning.”
      While it is not quite “the rhythm method”, it isn’t much better.
      I actually used this method not for contraception but to conceive, and it is very involved and requires a lot of work and attention to detail. It entails things like (TMI WARNING) taking a vaginal temperature as soon as you awake in the morning, monitoring your cervical fluid for color and consistency, and painstakingly keeping track of this information for numerous cycles until you can figure out which days you are fertile-then abstaining on those days. It has a much higher success rate for conception than for preventing pregnancy.
      Rare is the 18-25 year old woman with the time, patience, maturity, and desire to put this kind of effort in.
      The result is more unintended pregnancy… which logically will lead to more…. say it with me!

      “Well then these young people should just not have sex! Obviously!” And that is totally realistic, right?

      I hope that Obria is honest and up front with patients and presents all options, even if they don’t offer them. It doesn’t sound to me like they do.


      • “Well then these young people should just not have sex!” is always the fallback, unstated position of the anti-choice movement. Putting aside what it means not to be willing to say that out loud, there is also the issue of women who take birth controls for reasons beyond not wanting to get pregnant. The anti-choice movement repeatedly insists that these women do not exist – and claims in the linked piece that birth control is a carcinogen, which is a bold play given its popularity – and that, even if they do, their needs and concerns simply don’t matter. Which is bullshit, he writes, as both a husband and a father.

        As for Obria being up front and honest…I think we’ve seen what they think about that. This is the same old scam with a new name.


        • “Well then these young people should just not have sex!” is always the fallback, unstated position of the anti-choice movement. Putting aside what it means not to be willing to say that out loud, there is also the issue of women who take birth controls for reasons beyond not wanting to get pregnant.

          Remember, it’s only ‘young people’ who want to have sex that need contraceptives. They’re always unmarried, too. Heaven forbid actual married adult couples don’t want kids at that particular moment.

          In reality, 62% of women of reproductive-age women use contraceptives currently. Right this second…or I guess at least the next time they have sex.

          And once you start knocking out all the non-sexually-active and only-have-sex-with-women and currently-pregnant and actively-trying-for-children women, people who have no reason to use contraceptives, that statistic has to be above…I don’t know, 80%? I’m not sure, but the percentage of ‘women who might become pregnant but don’t want to’ who use contraceptives is…really really high. A vast majority.

          And basically _every_ woman who has had sex has used some form of contraceptive at some time. 99% of them. (And I suddenly find myself wondering if that last 1% has only ever had sex with women, or have some sort of biological issue that means they can’t get pregnant.)

          Contraceptive use is only this ‘thing only young unmarried people sinfully use’ to a very specific sort of men who make laws, who know basically nothing about biology, and never quite figured out their wives aren’t magically having less children than their great grandparents. (I was going to call them ‘older men’, but honestly they keep churning out new ones.)


  3. I would be very happy to see something come out that says:

    “We do exactly everything Planned Parenthood does, except we don’t do abortions. We will even give you a referral for a safe abortion place if we feel one might be medically necessary. Otherwise you will have ALL the same services PP would provide. No ifs, ands or buts”

    If you start qualifying what kind of contraceptive services you provide, or what kind of non-medical messages you might share with me, I start seeing red flags.


    • I mostly agree with this opinion. If your issue is with abortion, that should be your focus. Once it goes afield of that it sounds like this clinic is using the Abortion issue as it’s opening to go into other areas they want to impress their way of thinking on, and lose me in their argument.


  4. Since the current system is resulting in an ever increasing decline in abortions, I don’t understand why antiabortion people want to change it. What’s wrong with success?
    Also, why not do HIV testing? Diseases don’t disappear when you ignore them.


  5. I don’t have a problem with clinics that are “Planned Parenthood minus the abortion” receiving federal money, generally. But I think care should be taken that we are funding clinics that actually provide meaningful comprehensive care, not just the veneer of that as a cover for anti-abortion work.

    Obria, at least, seems to offer more than the typical “crisis pregnancy center”, though I do have some reservations.


  6. so no HIV testing and offers only “non-hormonal contraception”…

    You lost me right there as far as seeing Obria as in anyway a legitimate alternative to PP. I also expect that they don’t give referrals for amnio or genetic counseling, but given just the above I wouldn’t even go for a free ultrasound, since the agenda is so blatant I wouldn’t trust them to tell me if it showed anything indicating a problem with the baby’s health or a risk to mine.


  7. “A woman needs choice, but you can’t have a choice if the only clinic that a woman can go to is Planned, Parenthood.”

    Is it possible to take a “pro-life” position without being dishonest? Empirically, the answer appears to be no.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *