Amber Guyger Indicted For Murder

Avatar

Sam Wilkinson

According to a faithful reader, I'm Ordinary Times's "least thoughtful writer." So I've got that going for me, which is nice.

Related Post Roulette

18 Responses

  1. Avatar Jaybird says:

    Murder not manslaughter is interesting.

    Now I’m wondering what is going to come out during the trial that has been covered up by the police/press up to this point.Report

    • Avatar Doctor Jay in reply to Jaybird says:

      This is covered at the end of the linked article. It’s murder (what we’d call second-degree in CA) because she meant to shoot him and inflict grievous bodily harm at the moment she did shoot him.

      Manslaughter doesn’t contemplate any intention to harm, simply negligence.

      At least, that’s my limited understanding.Report

      • Avatar Jaybird in reply to Doctor Jay says:

        Oh, my suspicion is that we don’t know half of how awful the story is yet. It got murder instead of manslaughter not because of the “meant to shoot him and inflict grievous bodily harm”. She might have gotten away with that as a cop.

        It’s the stuff we don’t know that will get us to say “WHAT DO YOU MEAN IT’S ONLY 2ND?!?”

        And I wonder what that stuff is and at what point it comes out during the trial.Report

      • Avatar Morat20 in reply to Doctor Jay says:

        I recall digging into it at the time, and you’re absolutely right.

        Manslaughter (in that state) is pure negligence. Performing an action that any reasonable person knows can be lethal is “murder”. The act of aiming a gun and pulling the trigger is sufficient. (Very few people will claim “shooting someone” as “not being potentially lethal”).

        The mitigating factors (such as being confused, drunk, in the wrong apartment, under the mistaken impression there was a burglar, etc) are taken into account at sentencing, rather than charging. So, if convicted, her sentence range will be much lower as (as far as we know) she lacked such things as “premeditation”.Report

  2. Avatar dragonfrog says:

    If a person is charged with murder, can a jury find that they’re guilty of the lesser charge of manslaughter?

    Or is a charge of murder when there is ample evidence of manslaughter but not enough for murder, actually a way of getting someone an acquittal?Report

  3. Avatar Mike Schilling says:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_murder_rule_(Texas)

    Texas’s felony murder rule, codified in Texas Penal Code § 19.02(b)(3),[1] states that a person commits murder if he “commits or attempts to commit a felony, other than manslaughter, and in the course of and in furtherance of the commission or attempt, or in immediate flight from the commission or attempt, he commits or attempts to commit an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual.”

    So, if I understand this right, if Guyger is changed with manslaughter, murder is off the table, but if she’s charged with assault, she can also be convicted of felony murder.Report

  4. Avatar InMD says:

    I don’t think that’s applicable, or at least would be a really weird way to handle this. Felony murder is something charged when a person dies/is killed during the commission of a felony but the defendant isn’t the one who pulled the proverbial trigger. The leading case on it in Maryland for example was a situation where the defendant committed a robbery, initiated a car chase, and a bystander was killed by a police bullet in the resulting shootout. Defendant was convicted under the felony murder doctrine despite not being the person who actually shot the victim because the defendant created the situation through commission of a felony.

    Manslaughter is typically a lesser included offense in a regular.p murder charge (at least where I practice).

    Edit- screwed up the reply, this was to Mike Schilling.Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *