Morning Ed: Energy {2018.07.06.M}

[E1] Behold, panda power!

[E2] Ocean City, Maryland says not in our back yard and won’t be paid off with free energy.

[E3] Axios tries to explain the relationship between the oil boom and gasoline prices.

[E4] There have been some tremendous breakthroughs in nuclear power, but is it too little too late?

[E5] France, you’re killing me.

[E6] India’s pivot away from new coal production has been dramatic.

[E7] Texas is poised to jump into the #3 spot in oil extraction.

[E8] Oil and natural gas prices have traditionally been locked together, but that’s changing.

[E9] Can we conquer climate change with the profit motive?


Editor-in-Chief
Home Page Twitter Google+ Pinterest 

Will Truman is a former para-IT professional who is presently a stay-at-home father in the Mountain East. He has moved around frequently, having lived in six places since 2003, ranging from rural outposts to major metropolitan areas. He is also on Twitter. ...more →

Please do be so kind as to share this post.
Share

22 thoughts on “Morning Ed: Energy {2018.07.06.M}

        • And one state Rep, it seems.

          I honestly don’t get the aversion to seeing turbines in the distance. I think they are cool to look at and watch, and it’s an ocean view, it’s not like they are blocking a view of something further East.

          Has anyone ever done a poll of vacationers regarding their attitudes on a view of turbines in the distance*.

          *Keeping in mind that at 14 miles, you won’t see the whole turbine, since it will be dropping below the horizon by that point.

            Quote  Link

          Report

              • The platforms support marine life because they approximate coral reef habitats. I know this from various aquariums that have an underwater exhibit sponsored by an oil company that shows how they are abandoned in place for that purpose. I would expect wind turbines to do the same, at least after its operating life is completed.

                  Quote  Link

                Report

              • In addition in the gulf they provide a habitat for diving all be it mostly a chance to look at barnacles (the rigs are to far north for real coral reefs), but there may be large groups of fish under the rig. Fishermen like the rigs because the concentrate the fish making it easier to catch, plus a place to tie up the boat. I did one day of diving on a rig, then decided I would not do that again.

                  Quote  Link

                Report

            • Thing about a drilling platform is that there is always that looming concern that it’ll do a Deepwater Horizon and dump millions of barrels of oil onto the beach.

              Last I checked, a Wind Turbine that comes apart dumps maybe a dozen gallons of lube and hydraulic oil.

                Quote  Link

              Report

              • Back when I went to UC Santa Barbara I don’t recall the objection to the platforms being aesthetic. I actually quite liked the sound of the foghorns in the distance in foggy weather. But there were those blobs of tar on the beaches and in the water. (Pro tip: Turpentine take it right off. For tar in the hair, you probably want to go with vegetable oil. It isn’t as effective, but who wants turpentine in their hair?) It was clear that some of this was natural. The Chumash Indians used it to waterproof their canoes. But how much was natural was much less clear. I don’t know if there was any pre-oil derrick data. The oil companies claimed it was all natural, but I doubt even the Young Republicans really believed this.

                  Quote  Link

                Report

      • They don’t have a voice, but the concern is going to be whether the city can indirectly make the project more expensive and/or the city can lobby for legislation or more stringent regulatory review. Notice this line: they’ve already “scaled-back plans, because that is all the market will bear.”

          Quote  Link

        Report

        • Notice this line: they’ve already “scaled-back plans, because that is all the market will bear.”

          I read that as “We’ve refined our economic models, and at a price where we make a profit, we can’t sell as much electricity as we thought we could.” I assume they will be selling into the PJM marketplace, which can be complicated. There are — or at least were — a couple of generators in Virginia who were looking at an undersea HVDC link from southern Virginia to Long Island so they could bypass the PJM and sell into the much more lucrative New York market. There’s a very large partially-complete wind farm in Wyoming that will eventually sell large amounts of power to Southern California utilities, also over HVDC.

            Quote  Link

          Report

          • Actually HVDC leads to my wild nuclear plant scenario, put them on Hudson bay and the Arctic Ocean because cold water makes the plants more efficient. Then HVDC to tie back south, on the Quebec side of Hudson Bay the HVDC lines are already in place.

              Quote  Link

            Report

            • Quartz has a piece pointing out some nuclear plant shutdowns in Europe this year as the sources for the once-through cooling water got too hot. Southern Company in the US spent a modest fortune a few years ago converting a bunch of its plants cooling from once-through to evaporative to avoid the same problem. The Diablo Canyon nukes in California are shutting down in a few years because — at least IMO — the owners are not willing to risk the cost of building a whole new cooling system since California tightened the limits on how much waste heat power plants can dump into the Pacific. One of the reasons wind/solar is increasingly popular in much of the American West is that there’s no more available* fresh water for cooling.

              Wonder how Canada is going to look at dumping waste heat into the Arctic Ocean and Hudson’s Bay?

              * Western water law is… different.

                Quote  Link

              Report

  1. As I worked my way through the articles, and mapped them onto the long-term US situation as I see it, I came to the conclusion that in 20-25 years the 36 states plus DC that make up the Eastern Interconnect are going to be so screwed.

      Quote  Link

    Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *