Morning Ed: Media {2016.05.30.M}

Will Truman

Will Truman is the Editor-in-Chief of Ordinary Times. He is also on Twitter.

Related Post Roulette

29 Responses

  1. Richard Hershberger says:

    Re Trump and the media, this isn’t so much making it up as cramming it into the established narrative. This is what the media does. It shouldn’t, but providing context and stuff is a lot harder work, and the media collectively isn’t up to the task. This also isn’t partisan. It goes in both directions: Al Gore claimed to have invented the internet! Har, har, har! What a liar! And so on. This is why campaigns work so hard to establish the narrative they want. Trump, for all his vaunted media savvy, established this narrative all on his own, and has to live with it.Report

  2. Oscar Gordon says:

    Good to see slut shaming biting him in the ass.Report

    • Brandon Berg in reply to Oscar Gordon says:

      Should have stuck to mooch-shaming her.Report

    • Marchmaine in reply to Oscar Gordon says:

      Yes and no… long slog through the article, but it doesn’t really say what its writers want it to say – unless by “in trouble” it means that Rush’s next expected long term contract will drop from $38M/year to an estimated $15M-$20M/ year. It’s a little bit like the baseball article that Richard wrote… changing revenue streams are hitting media across the board. The link to Fluke is a buried lede:

      [after the Fluke incident] JCPenney PR executive Kate Coultas explains this via email. “We [now] have a general ‘no run’ policy in place to not advertise on any kind of political program,” Coultas writes.

      Its more of an RTod point that all political media is becoming toxic… Politico seems to establishh that the Fluke episode was indeed a defining moment, but one that is hitting all Political talkshows:

      The Sandra Fluke incident “did a lot of harm to talk radio,” Darryl Parks says. “Thirty-eight percent of revenue disappeared overnight.” And the damage was not limited to Limbaugh; he hurt all of talk radio, including even some liberal hosts.

      Rush’s was just the instigator and the biggest by percentage to suffer…owing not in a small part to the actual costs he charges to carry his show – hence the fact that while still profitable, his next contract will need to address the changes to the market (and his aging demographic).

      Rush is going to take a haircut and will have to make due with merely obscene amounts of money instead of obnoxiously odious amounts of money.

      This was not the article Political wanted us to think it wrote.

      {Virtue signaling, I’ve never listened to Rush… the only time I remember ever watching something was in his early days during the Perot/Clinton/Bush cycle – everyone was all about Charts, and Rush was no exception.}Report

      • Oscar Gordon in reply to Marchmaine says:

        Ya know, having the public in general treat you as toxic enough to cost you about half your annual revenue because of some stupid crap you said is a pretty substantial chunk out of ones ass. Sure, he can still afford all the prescription painkillers his addiction demands, but his bank account, and his voice, are both deservedly diminished.

        The fact that it also helped to make other toxic political talk less appealing to advertisers is a bonus.Report

  3. Marchmaine says:

    On the Couric thing… given all that we’ve learned in the past decade about Jon Stewart shows “cleverly” editing the cut that hits the air; and, given the ubiquity of cheap video and audio recording devices – why would anyone who was asked to speak on any controversial subject not simultaneously record the entirety of their time with the media?

    Its pretty clear that there are over 4 minutes of responses (some good, some bad, some ugly) to that single question.

    My question is more about the process than the incident… do folks not take precautions? Does the media team not let them? Do folks take precautions, but 99% of the time no one ever cares enough to run the contrary evidence?

    {I like Jon Stewart}Report

    • Marchmaine says:

      Couric […] was […] ugly.Report

    • RTod in reply to Marchmaine says:

      The Couric thing is actually pretty scary. Not that it happened (which is not really new for network news) but that there’s been no apology, retraction, or even clarification after getting caught with their hand in the cookie jar (which is).

      Just one more piece of data showing that the talk radio/blog/infotainment model is slowly course correcting journalism, and not the other way around.Report

      • Stillwater in reply to RTod says:

        Less than a year into Couric’s reign as anchor of the evening news she was busted for plagiarizing a Wall Street Journal article about that writer’s personal experiences of libraries and the importance of reading and presenting those thoughts as her own. She’s got a track record here, man!Report

      • Oscar Gordon in reply to RTod says:

        Couric is quite partisan. Partisan media figures don’t care about credibility anymore. The true believers and the casual audience will forgive and forget, and the the opposition never believes them anyhow, so why bother?Report

      • Mo in reply to RTod says:

        Couric is on Yahoo. She’s more new media than old. If she was still in old media, she’s likely have to do a Lara Logan style retraction/suspension.Report

    • aaron david in reply to Marchmaine says:

      “My question is more about the process than the incident… do folks not take precautions? Does the media team not let them? Do folks take precautions, but 99% of the time no one ever cares enough to run the contrary evidence?”

      I think that there was a sense that the media was actually in the business of providing news and not shaping news. As we know that is no longer true – from both sides of the political fence* – coupled with the ability to record your interviews cheaply and this is the new normal.


  4. Jaybird says:

    Politico has a very concern trolly article.

    Donald Trump can actually win if Clinton makes these four mistakes. Spoiler alert: She’s already making all of them.

    Number Three will surprise you!Report

  5. Mo says:

    Here’s an excuse for treating Trump unfairly, “Welcome to a presidential campaign, everyone gets treated unfairly with selective editing.”Report

  6. notme says:

    Holder says Snowdon did us “a public service?” Sure, telling our enemies how we intercept their cummincations was a good thing.

  7. Damon says:

    Guns and the media? Par for the course.

    Fluke: RiiiiightReport

  8. DavidTC says:

    “I think a ‘social-justice warrior’ is someone who is offended by a basic fact — they think a social-justice warrior is just anybody who is offended ever, for any reason.”