Alyssa Rosenberg: How much violence is too much on ‘Game of Thrones’? {Spoilers}

Avatar

Will Truman

Will Truman is the Editor-in-Chief of Ordinary Times. He is also on Twitter.

Related Post Roulette

42 Responses

  1. Avatar Mike Schilling
    Ignored
    says:

    The reason Ned Stark’s (Sean Bean) beheading at the end of the first season of “Game of Thrones” is so upsetting isn’t just because of the blood or violence involved. It’s because Ned’s death lets us know what characters like Cersei Lannister (Lena Headey) have done and are willing to keep doing to survive

    That is, Rosenberg has no idea why Ned got killed and who did and didn’t want that to happen.Report

    • Avatar Don Zeko in reply to Mike Schilling
      Ignored
      says:

      I doubt many show watchers (or book readers, for that matter) would know who to, ahem, finger for that particular crime.Report

      • Avatar Mike Schilling in reply to Don Zeko
        Ignored
        says:

        Even he didn’t expect Ned to wind up dead. The fix was in: Ned would confess to being a traitor and be allowed to take the Black, which gets him completely out of the way (at the edge of the world and sworn not to mess with politics) without starting a civil war. But they didn’t figure on a certain monster whose word was law.Report

        • Avatar Don Zeko in reply to Mike Schilling
          Ignored
          says:

          The circumstantial case is fairly convincing that somebody whispered in Joffrey’s ear. So who benefits from a dead Ned? Like you say, Ned’s death prevented the quick and relatively bloodless resolution of the war, which was what both the Starks and the Lannisters all wanted. Littlefinger, on the other hand, ungrq Arq sbe zneelvat Png, fcrag gur ragver svefg obbx pbafcvevat gb oevat gur Ynaavfgref naq Fgnexf vagb ivbyrag pbasyvpg, and saw instability and war as a ladder by which he could punish those that he felt had slighted him and achieve the power, love, and social standing that he felt had been denied him due to his low birth.Report

    • Avatar James K in reply to Mike Schilling
      Ignored
      says:

      @mike-schilling

      Indeed, she managed to get both the decision-maker and the motive wrong. Although, I submit the most shocking death of Season 1 wasn’t Eddard Stark, it was Drogo and Danaerys’s child.Report

    • Avatar Burt Likko in reply to Mike Schilling
      Ignored
      says:

      This ignores that Cersei had brokered a “confession” out of Ned, in exchange for which he’d get to take the black and his family would get to go home to Winterfell except for Hostage Sansa. Little Joffrey The Pissant ruined it all by insisting on another wolf being slain.

      The violence was necessary to the narrative there because Ned alive would have been too strong a focus for anti-Lannister resistance: even untested young Robb inherited that charisma and made a credible bid for independence. Leaving Ned in the picture means too many people agitating for King Eddard, the first of his name, of House Stark.Report

      • Avatar Mike Schilling in reply to Burt Likko
        Ignored
        says:

        You’re forgetting about the oath that accompanies taking the Black. As much as Robert wants to kill every Targaryen, even children, he has no fear of ones in the Night Watch. And a publicly disgraced Ned, succeeded by his son in lawful fashion, is not particularly a source of outrage.Report

        • Avatar North in reply to Mike Schilling
          Ignored
          says:

          Tywin Lannister summarized it as “Madness and stupidity” and then backed up his sentiments with action by dispatching his most despised child to take charge of Kings’ Landing in his absence.Report

        • Avatar Mike Dwyer in reply to Mike Schilling
          Ignored
          says:

          I agree with Mike’s assessment here. In the GoT world, taking the Black really is a magical reset button. It restores family honor, forgives you for murder, removes you as a threat to someone’s power, etc. And Ned was considered the most honorable man in Westeros. If he had taken the Black everyone would have known that removed him from the game.Report

    • Avatar El Muneco in reply to Mike Schilling
      Ignored
      says:

      Sean Bean being beheaded wasn’t a surprise to anyone who has been paying attention to his career. If there was any surprise, it’s that it was in the first act, not the third….Report

    • Avatar A Teacher in reply to Mike Schilling
      Ignored
      says:

      I think she’s very aware of who the culprit was in that particular case, but also that said guilty party isn’t a factor into the modern seasons. Lady Lannister, on the other hand, certainly ~is~ still a factor and her character weighs heavily on the minds of current viewers.

      Though I might take her to task for saying “to survive”….. She is clearly not just surviving, she is reaching for every bit of power she can.Report

  2. Avatar LeeEsq
    Ignored
    says:

    Game of Thrones is supposed to be a deconstruction of the sanitized medieval world of the typical fantasy novel. It goes to far in the other direction at times though.Report

  3. Avatar Saul Degraw
    Ignored
    says:

    You know, I’ve never seen an episode of Game of Thrones and probably never well. One day I am going to work on essay on why the Internet seems to make pop culture a compulsion.Report

  4. Avatar Jaybird
    Ignored
    says:

    When I was a kid, we regularly had access to books that talked about pop culture and how wicked it was. Lyrics of “rock and roll” songs were listed (and the phrases from the songs that were played backwards) and scenes from popular movies, television shows, and even Saturday Morning Cartoons were dissected.

    Look at this album cover!
    Look at this stage outfit!
    Read what Papa Smurf said!

    Those provincial rubes.Report

    • Avatar LeeEsq in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      I never understood this aspect of Protestant Christianity. The Catholic Church exerted a great deal of moral censorship but it wasn’t as total as what some Protestants went for. The Catholic Church was perfectly fine with secular entertainment as long as it wasn’t too against the teachings of the Church. So something like a Frank Capra movie or Frank Sinatra would be fine for Catholics to watch or listen to. Some of the Protestant Churches went completely against all secular entertainment. If it wasn’t about Jesus, it was evil and immoral.Report

      • Avatar Kim in reply to LeeEsq
        Ignored
        says:

        “The Catholic Church was perfectly fine with secular entertainment as long as it wasn’t too against the teachings of the Church.”
        …dedicating an opera to the devil himself was a bit too far.Report

    • Avatar Mike Schilling in reply to Jaybird
      Ignored
      says:

      And that was before the internet! Imagine how useful a list of “Don’t let your children watch this film! Especially not the part starting at 23:17, when her low-cut top slips down” would be.Report

  5. Avatar Christopher Carr
    Ignored
    says:

    I think it’s interesting that we pretend our world isn’t just as violent and disgusting as the world of a Song of Ice and Fire.

    We describe it as a violent fantasy, when it is in fact simply realist.Report

    • Avatar LeeEsq in reply to Christopher Carr
      Ignored
      says:

      There was a lot more casual violence in the world in the past but it wasn’t as gritty as Game of Thrones made it out to be either. The idea of law and order was important and most people really didn’t like being hurt or killed back than either.Report

  6. Avatar Will H.
    Ignored
    says:

    What I find distasteful about the whole line of inquiry the subject article forwards is the underlying notion that everything is for everybody.

    If I am dismayed by moral depravity announced as the the triumph of man by Kenny Rogers because I am strictly opposed to gambling, then I must be looking a little too hard for something to whine about.
    Which is what’s going on with this thing.

    If the amount of violence in GoT is the biggest thing you’ve got to worry about– or even big enough to make it onto your radar– life must be pretty good.

    That is, when I say that the writer of this Post piece should go to hell, I mean that in the nicest possible way.Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *