Charlie Hebdo Update
The suspects and another ally are dead. The Ally killed 3 and injured 5 in a hostage situation at a Kosher supermarket in Paris.
by Saul DeGraw · January 9, 2015
The suspects and another ally are dead. The Ally killed 3 and injured 5 in a hostage situation at a Kosher supermarket in Paris.
March 28, 2011
December 3, 2013
October 8, 2013
TRENTON, N.J. - New Jersey legislators have approved three bills that reshaped how the Garden State handles drug use involving marijuana.
The state’s Senate and Assembly voted first to create a new and legal marijuana industry from scratch and called for new regulations to be written within six months.
Additionally, both houses approved a bill that decriminalizes possession of up to six ounces of cannabis. That second bill is designed to stop arrests and expunge criminal records of low-level marijuana offenses.
...
Now, the Garden State is set to become the only state in the U.S. where adults can legally use, possess, and purchase cannabis while still risking prison for growing marijuana at home—under any circumstances.
(Featured image is "NEW JERSEY 1953 ---FARM USE LICENSE PLATE" by woody1778a and is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0)
Comment →Leon Black plans to step down as chief executive of Apollo Global Management Inc. after an independent review revealed larger-than-expected payments to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein that it nevertheless deemed justified.
The months long review by Dechert LLP found no evidence that Mr. Black was involved in the criminal activities of the late Epstein, who was indicted in 2019 on federal sex-trafficking charges involving underage girls, according to a copy of the law firm’s report that was viewed by The Wall Street Journal.
In its report, Dechert found the fees that the billionaire had paid Epstein were for legitimate advice on trust- and estate-tax planning that proved to be of significant value to Mr. Black and his family. Mr. Black paid Epstein a total of $148 million, plus a $10 million donation to his charity—far more than was previously known.
(Featured image is "Did You Say 'Bribe'?" by ccPixs.com and is licensed under CC BY 2.0)
Comment →When I was a kid, I heard a handful of references to "Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition" but I had always assumed that the song was a parody. Like, it was a much more bitter "I-Feel-Like-I'm-Fixin'-to-Die Rag" from Country Joe and the Fish.
I've recently had an opportunity to listen to the song a couple of times and was inspired to do research into it and, as it turns out, it was written in 1942 as a response to the attack on Pearl Harbor.
I've listened to three or four versions of the song but have concluded that this version is my favorite. I hope you like it too.
(Featured image is "5.56 Match Ammo" by mr.smashy and is licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0)
Comment →Food, or Eating Your Beans and Cornbread Thankfully Like An Adult
January 26, 2021
January 25, 2021
January 25, 2021
Food, or Eating Your Beans and Cornbread Thankfully Like An Adult
January 26, 2021
January 26, 2021
Telework Will Change Our Cities, and (Maybe) Our Politics
January 26, 2021
Praise The Lord And Pass The Ammunition
January 25, 2021
Buy American: President Biden’s Executive Order
January 25, 2021
Impeachment: A Briar Patch With No Rabbits
January 23, 2021
President Biden’s Inauguration: Day One for Forty Six
January 20, 2021
Fox News Shouldn’t Have Called Arizona When They Did
January 21, 2021
January 20, 2021
Electoral Trends: Into The Biden Era
January 22, 2021
Horrible.
Definitional question: is this terrorism, or is it crime? There are indications that the brothers who did the shooting at Charlie Hebdo, at least, received training at an al-Qaeda camp in Yemen. But still, I’m voting for “crime.” And as big a fan as I am of due process of law, I think that an outcome like this has the very thin silver lining of sparing the justice system of La France the troublesome problem of what to do with very, very odious criminals.
When I asked this question — I believe about Hasan/Ft. Hood or Benghazi — the response seemed to be that brown(ish) Muslims using violence = terrorism. But maybe that was only if the victims were American.
It is both. Many or even all terrorist attacks are crimes because they usually involve some action that is against the law. Terrorism can be seen as criminal acts done for ideological purposes. The massacre at Charlie Hebdo involved the felony of murder but it was for ostensibly a religious reason, making it ideologically inspired.
@burt-likko
At the very least it is a highly ideologically motivated crime and the targets were specifically chosen. I don’t think going to a Kosher market was accidental.
“Definitional question: is this terrorism, or is it crime?”
i don’t know how much of a difference it makes. given the political nature of the attack and the civilian nature of the target there’s at least a decent foothold to call it terrorism. but at the end of the day i tend to think of that term as political art after the fact.
it was, if nothing else, certainly asymmetrical warfare.
@dhex
Unfortunately, it is much more than political art. At least in the States, deeming someone/something a terrorist/act of terrorism completely changes the legal process from there on out.
@kazzy
i would say that’s just a longer way of saying “political art after the fact”.
@dhex
I guess my discomfort with that term is that “art” makes me think that the decision between the use of the terms is ultimately of little consequence. I understand ‘political art after the fact’ to essentially dismiss @burt-likko ‘s question as merely being about semantics.
If I am misunderstanding the term (highly likely!) then please, A) help me understand it better and B) accept my sincerest of apologies!
@kazzy
“I guess my discomfort with that term is that “art” makes me think that the decision between the use of the terms is ultimately of little consequence.”
not of little consequence, but as something appended after the fact for maximum political advantage. it has no genuine “reality” to grasp, and the dead – like all who die in the public eye by whatever means – are simply a tool to achieve advantage by whomever can seize it.
as someone who teaches young children, the nihilistic reality of true power should be readily evident. 🙂
Duly noted. And, yes, I agree then. At least insofar how the-powers-that-be answer the question. I don’t think Burt’s query was aimed at putting his thumb on the scale. But the usual suspects certainly will do so.
To your last point, I used the phrase “benevolent little dictator” during a P/T conference this year. That’s a 10-pointer!
“At least in the States, deeming someone/something a terrorist/act of terrorism completely changes the legal process from there on out.”
it seems to me that the distinction makes a difference when prosecuting individuals before any incident occurs, but after the fact, not so much. Hassan, Eric Frein, Eric Rudolph, McVeigh & Nichols were all, as far as I can tell, charged and/or convicted of straight up homicide or conspiracy to commit the same. Though wiki say the OKC perpetrators were also convicted of WMD use – which is the same thing the living Tsarnev brother is being charged with, also per wiki
(there’s also a small sample size of ‘people captured alive after committing mass murder’, both over the past 14 years and more generally)
Al Qaeda is claiming responsibility.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2015/01/09/al-qaeda-in-yemen-claims-paris-attack.html?via=twitter_page
But how do we really know?
North Korea kills a movie, so al-Qaeda goes after a magazine.
Keeping up with the Joneses, I see.
I tell ya’ when these guys all find out about the Internet, they are going to be sooooo mad!