Nick Gillespie’s Weird Criticism of Spitzer/Weiner
Nick Gillespie of Reason has written for The Daily Beast what is an essentially boring and rehashed “liberalism-multiplies-its-own-failures” libertarian critique. What caught my eye, though, was the way he decided to begin his argument (emphasis his):
The second coming of disgraced and oversexed pols Anthony Weiner (quite probably the next mayor of New York City) and Eliot Spitzer (who has announced a bid for city comptroller) helps to explain widespread and growing contempt for government. Every grandpa in Peoria, every schoolgirl in Seattle, every cartoon of a crying Statue of Liberty is asking the same question: What do you have to do to get banished from government work?
I thought libertarians were the ones who believed that consensual sexual relations were beyond the purview of the government? If the way we get our kicks isn’t the government’s business, then shouldn’t it follow that it’s not grounds for dismissal from government, either? Maybe there’s some next-level jujitsu theory I’m not thinking of, but this looks to me like a pretty cynical and disingenuous play to irrational public sentiment.