I don’t follow international affairs as much as some people, but I actually had been keeping an eye on Mali due to one of the candidates being a BYU-educated Mormon. Now it looks like there might not (probably won’t?) be an election. Mali is generally considered an ally to the United States and is designated “Free” by Freedom House, though the average Malian makes less then $4/day. This is considered by some to be fallout from recent happenings in Libya.
We have been experiencing some system resource issues. We believe the problem may be resolved, but if it is not please bear with us.
on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassOne of the things that I don't understand from Pro-Palestinian Westerners is how they keep on insist…
on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassThink of all the bricks that get thrown at BLM. The theory of building a minority organization is di… on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassWhen I read the wiki on the alleged sex crimes during the attack we seem to have a large volume of c… on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassOne of the issues with "subtract the situation" is "everything we know could be wrong". So for examp… on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassThe time frame is more complicated. Even after the Six Day War, it was seen as a larger Israel-Arab…
on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassIf you haven't seen this, you should. It's only a few seconds and it's really a treat. (Note: You sh… on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassThe underdog status ended after the Six Day War over there. It's wobbly over here but there are stil… on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassI also expect that the period where Jews were seen as an underdog was short and not entirely univers…
on The Shifting Politics of AbortionThe two big stories of political geography in the US over the last 30 years is the huge swing from b… on Free Speech, But No Freedom to HarassAnd what really pisses me off isn't necessarily the anti-Zionism per se but just treating Jews as di…
April 24, 2024
April 23, 2024
Friend Husband At The Ballpark
April 22, 2024
Good Morning! Are You An Amateur?
April 21, 2024
on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
on The Shifting Politics of Abortion on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass
on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on The Shifting Politics of Abortion on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on The Shifting Politics of Abortion on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on The Shifting Politics of Abortion on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on Free Speech, But No Freedom to Harass on The Shifting Politics of Abortion
Sadly, I believe “Malia has a Coupe” would (and will) get more coverage (and more outrage from some sources)Report
I’m generally not a fan of unicausal explanations like Larison seems to be wanting to push on the Malian Coup. Still sounding out some Africa hands to see if they know a bit more on the background. Seems like there was already a substantial tinderbox ready to light.Report
I agree on unicausality, though Larison is not the only one pointing the finger at Libya playing a pretty substantial role.Report
Yeah, but this is kind of standard fare for anti-interventionists in general. If something has a proximate variable cause, they’ll try to turn that into a primary variable.
I would imagine if we’d stopped the Rwandan genocide, that the intervention for doing so would be blamed as the cause of instability in Uganda and Zaire/Congo. In fact that’s one of the reasons given by some advocates of not intervening in that genocide, nevermind that in the end result the Interahamwe and RGF wound up moving on to Zaire and Uganda anyway.Report
I’m generally anti-interventionist, and even to me it Rwanda seems like a case where greater intervention could have prevented the massive Congo-Uganda-Rwanda war (1998-2003), in addition to preventing the Rwandan genocide. There are plenty of cases that show unintended negative consequences of intervention, but Rwanda is one that shows the opposite – massive negative consequences of non-intervention.Report
My point was more that it’s likely that if there had been intervention in Rwanda, the resulting displacement of the RGF and Interawame would likely have set off a series of events similar to this Mali situation, likely as not resulting in political instability in Zaire, and militias acting in terrible ways along the Uganda-Rwanda border. Obviously in that case we’d be arguing the hypothetical, of where we’d make the case that we prevented lots of bloodshed, but the Larisons of the world would be scolding us for making up numbers and seeing how we’d created the human rights attrocities of the Congo.Report
The wild card in this situation is the same one in the Libyan situation, the Tuareg. Without their support, (and no country has such support) all these regimes will fail.
Yet another argument for the repartitioning of Africa and the Middle East. It’ll never happen, not soon anyway. Sigh….Report
Do you think the Tuareg should have their own country?
And who decides on the partition lines? Europe and America don’t have great records in that regard, and none of the leaders of currently-existing Middle Eastern and African countries are going to want to lose territory (much less abolish their countries altogether). And even if there are good partition lines that won’t create as many conflicts as they prevent – something which is doubtful – who enforces them? How many wars are we willing to fight, and for how long, to reshape the maps of Africa and the Middle East.
It’s one thing to recognize something shouldn’t have been done; it’s another thing to seek to reverse it a century or more later.Report