There are few things in life I find more intellectually compelling and challenging than a considered piece by Ta-Nehisi Coates. This is such a piece.
Mark of New Jersey
Mark is a Founding Editor of The League of Ordinary Gentlemen, the predecessor of Ordinary Times.
We have been experiencing some system resource issues. We believe the problem may be resolved, but if it is not please bear with us.
on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpI find that I’m much less extroverted now than I used to be... Kept granddaughter #3 on Wednesday wh…
on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpI'm skeptical of the reviews. It's solidly fresh on RT but even the good ones from the top critics s… on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpSo, having swapped out the flannel for linen, and broken out the summer clothes, how are you dealing…
on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpI went to the mechanic yesterday for a regularly scheduled checkup. My battery needed to be replaced… on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpGuy Ritchie... hrm. That's tough. I mean, nobody is the artist of violence like Tarantino is. He's m… on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpI am fixing to go out to Trader Joe's for some staples and then Costco for some other staples and a… on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024which in turn is having a demonstrable negative impact on audience size and composition because of b… on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024No, it's not that he doesn't agree with me. There are plenty of people who don't agree with me. It's…
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024His thesis - which I think I am now writing out for the fifth or maybe sixth time - is that a lack o…
on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpYeah, I totally get this. I find that I'm much less extroverted now than I used to be, and I'm worki…
Planning The Annual Trip Around The World
April 19, 2024
April 18, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 16, 2024
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
Now if only the dude would spend more time cranking out stuff like this and less time posting random YouTube clips and open threads.Report
@Will, Agreed.
I find a lot of respectable writers shower praise on TNC. I find his blog posts (which is, I’ll admit, all I’ve ever read) are all over the map. Sometimes they’re great. Sometimes they’re fluff (which isn’t necessarily a bad thing). Sometimes his writing is quite sloppy, and then he gets all churlish with his commenters when they don’t agree with him or misunderstand his poorly worded prose.
This post, however, demonstrates that, yes indeed, he’s a valuable voice.Report
As to the post itself – what I think Coates forgets is that when Southerners honor their Confederate forbearers, we’re usually thinking about a great-great grandfather who served in some miscellaneous regiment, often as a private carrying a rifle he brought from home. When I visit the Confederate cemetery down the street from my house, I’m not reading the ranks on the tombstone. I’m reading things like “1st Kentucky Mounted Rifles” and “4th Kentucky Infantry”. Sure, some of these men either owned slaves or benefited from slavery or held positive views towards slavery…but that’s gone now. What remains is that they are my fellow Kentuckians and in my state, as in many other Southern states, that means something.
I’m certainly not an apologist for the Confederacy or the Southern Cause or slavery…but I get goosebumps when I hear ‘Dixie’. I also think that ‘Amazing Grace’ is the most beautiful song ever written and The ‘Battle Hymn of the Republic’ is a close second. That is the contradiction that Southerners live with today.Report
@Mike at The Big Stick, Well said, Mike.Report
@Mike at The Big Stick, Mike: I think Coates would say that he doesn’t have any problem with the type of ancestor honor you’re referring to here. He’s not explicit about that in this particular post, but I think he’s been explicit about that in the past.
Instead, I take his point as being directed at the revisionist movement that has, it would seem, achieved quite a bit of success over the years in persuading people that the South seceded over something other than slavery, with R.E. Lee’s humanitarianism leading the way as Exhibit A of what the Confederacy was really about. Particularly with respect to Lee, the revisionists have been incredibly successful at dissociating him from a regard for the institution of slavery.
TNC’s line of posts on this subject are unique and useful in that they recognize that there really was quite a bit to admire in a R.E. Lee and in Confederate ancestors more generally, while also acknowledging their humanity and the fact that they were still prisoners of a particular worldview that was just normal to them.
In some ways, this is the flip-side to the “Anti-fascist Super Hero” problem that Freddie shredded back in November: http://www.ordinary-gentlemen.com/2009/11/anti-fascist-super-heroes/
Rather than discard the good of Lee and Confederate ancestors, Confederate revisionism simply tries to demean and minimize the bad. Coates’ posts provide a way of coming to terms with the role of ancestors in slavery while still holding them in high regard.Report
Having spent ten years or so writing civil war battle sagas of America’s Civil War I’ve developed a certain appreciation for the Southern fighting man, the secessionist cause, that special conservatism located south of the Mason-Dixon line, and the knowledge that the South, Constitutionally speaking, had every right to secede.
Lincoln engaged the North in war not because of any idealists nonsense about slavery or African-American rights or the horrors of African chattel slavery rather because in April of ’61 the Confederate States of America House of Representatives, in Montgomery, I believe, passed a national tarriff that was very much lower than the Lincoln tarriff. And, that my friends really pissed off the east coast bankers and manufacturers who feared mightily for their profits, elite “monied interests” as they say. I’m not sure at all that there would have been a war had not the Confederates passed that very low tarriff.
Slavery, it is argued would have ended sooner with two countries, simply because the Confederacy could not stop the slaves from fleeing north across the Ohio River. The truth is northern racism was even more virulent than Southern.
Pat Cleburne wanted to enlist blacks in the army in exchange for manumission.
Old Abe was as racist.
Martin Luther King was a Republican.
Bobby Lee freed his slaves before U.S. Grant.
Stonewall Jackson had a Sunday School class that was comprised of all black kids.
Enslaving another person is totally weird, but then so is butchering your kin in the womb. I wonder what our ancestors will be saying about us in a hundred years?Report
@Bob Cheeks,
Wow, Bob. I think you covered the complete gamut of Confederate apologia.
The Civil War wasn’t really about slavery, Confederates weren’t really racist, actually the Unionists were the racists, Republicans used to be the party of civil rights, and hey, abortion is worse than slavery anyway.
Keep on fighting. . you’ll rise again.
Someday.Report
@sidereal, My family hails from Kentucky and, when I visit them, I see a weird resentment toward the Northerners who brought enlightenment and reconstruction to their ignorant selves.
Instead of being thankful towards the kind liberals who brought modern values, they get all hung up on being called “hillbillies” and considered ignorant for having different vowels.
Instead of greeting the Reconstruction with flowers, they instead act like really passive-aggressive Iraqis who just don’t appreciate being dragged, kicking and screaming, into the 20th Century.
Stupid Hillbillies. They should be thanking us.Report
@Jaybird,
I know, right? Remember all those times I called Bob a hillbilly and made fun of his (theoretical, as I have not heard him speak) accent? Or all those times I reconstructed him? Insufferable on my part.
The only reasonable response is to pretend the Civil War was about cotton.
Ressentiment, indeed.Report
@sidereal, sidereal, I have a faux-Southern accent, known colloquially as Picksburgese that I frequently use when around youngins edumacated by libruls. I usually find a way to bring my conversation stopper into the inevitable argument, “A good Democrat is a dead Democrat.” It has a ring to it!
My kin were border people, kinda like Jaybird’s maybe?Report
@Bob Cheeks, Stephen Colbert you are a treasure.Report
@sidereal, maybe we need a surge for Reconstruction. Eventually they will thank us.Report
@Jaybird, I am a lifelong Kentuckian who married into a family of Yankees from *gulp* Cape Cod. I share your family’s pain.Report
@Mike at The Big Stick, my family did do what they could to make sure I was raised with as little an accent as possible. Only in my 30’s did I realize that, maybe, I ought be ashamed a hair that I don’t have one like they do.Report
@Jaybird, I can turn mine on and off depending on the situation. At work, all of my clients and my management team live in the Northeast. I’ve developed a very generic midwestern dialect for conference calls and such. On the flip side, when I’m around my family or on hunting trips with the guys, I drop all my g’s and sound like I grew up on the farm.Report
@sidereal, much respect.Report
I’m sorry, I still see the question of slavery and the civil war as distinct. The South didn’t wage war on the North to enforce slavery. They wanted to take their ball and go home. I think it’s consistent to condemn slavery, the war, and the institutional changes that occurred as a result of the war.Report
@Cascadian,
Exactly, not to mention that the federal gov’t back then couldn’t afford to lose all the customs duties collected in the southern ports. Frankly, I still fail to see why the states that joined togerther to create the federal gov’t can’t choose to leave it. It seems axiomatic of the ideas embodied in the 10th amendment.Report
@Cascadian, True, but that’s not the point here, which is that the Confederate cause is unworthy of respect. It is the elevation of the Confederacy to some sort of especially noble entity that is terribly wrong-headed, not the elevation of ancestors or even of particular Confederate leaders. R.E. Lee was almost certainly an exceptional person, even an exceptionally noble person; but that does not change the fact that the cause for which he fought was, ultimately, slavery.Report
@Mark Thompson, I don’t think the Confederacy was any less noble than any other country which accepted slavery, the US being among them. To be sure – many Union sympathizers, Lincoln’s best friend among them, believed slavery would be preserved in the United States. One can imagine how much support Lincoln would have lost if he had made his emancipation plans known in 1861.
I think if the implication is that the Confederate government was flawed then one must also assume the governments of the Union slave-holding states were also flawed. Keep in mind that my own state only entered the war officially when it’s neutrality was violated by Confederate incursions. They would have prefered to sit it out and maintain slavery within our borders.Report
@Mike at The Big Stick, The difference is that the Confederacy was explicitly fighting to preserve slavery. It was, quite literally, a nation based on slavery. The Union and the antebellum United States, by contrast, was a nation that merely had slavery.
No matter how ignoble the Union’s initial cause may have been, its cause was not slavery, and it is difficult to imagine a more ignoble cause.Report
@Mark Thompson, Or, to borrow a famous quote from Gen. Sherman (who I probably would not consider a terribly decent person): “A better set of men never served a worse cause.”Report
@Mark Thompson, My sentiments exactly.
It’s extremely hard to really put ourselves in the mindset of Civil War actors. Stonewall Jackson, for example, was an extremely devout Christian who was, by most accounts, as kind to blacks as anyone could expect from a Southerner in the 1860’s. Even still, he believed slavery was God’s will.
An interesting question is what is worse, the moral justification for a war or the way a war is fought itself? For example, the reasons we fought in WWII were fairly noble. The way we fought the war is certainly ripe for moral critique. But that was 60 years ago and wars were fought differently. Slaveholding was such a radically different concept to our contemporary sensibilities that it’s far too easy to take the moral high ground too far.Report
@Mike at The Big Stick, That’s a question I’ve found myself struggling with quite often, actually – or at least a similar question. I still haven’t found a good answer.Report
@Mark Thompson, Trust me, I’m no fan of the South. However, focusing on their moral character as the de facto response to their complaints is misleading. They should have been allowed to leave. The political maneuvers used to bring about the war (Maryland) and to fundamentally alter the state (fourteenth) significantly undermine the moral high ground of the North in my view. Unfortunately, one can’t have a conversation about something like secession or nullification without being charged with supporting slavery or worshiping Henry Clay.Report