So, I don’t have the time or the philosophical chops to comment on the (to me, at least) fascinating exchange between William B. (also here) and Jason Kuznicki. But, I wanted to point our readers to this response to William’s first entry from Lee at A Thinking Reed. I’d also like to beg Jason for his thoughts on Lee’s response, and particularly Lee’s points about John Stuart Mill.
Mark of New Jersey
Mark is a Founding Editor of The League of Ordinary Gentlemen, the predecessor of Ordinary Times.
We have been experiencing some system resource issues. We believe the problem may be resolved, but if it is not please bear with us.
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024That is not the dictionary definition of tantrum. A tantrum is "an uncontrolled outburst of anger an… on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024Definition of "Tantrum" : an uncontrolled outburst of anger and frustration His prescribed solution…
on Planning The Annual Trip Around The WorldHaving been to Iceland in the current year, I can't imagine what it might have looked like back then…
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024Holy buckets! A successful union drive in the south?
on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpHeh, I don't really keep track of directors... but looking at IMDB I liked Sherlock and Man from UNC… on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024Update about yesterday's missile attack on Iran: There have been no missile attack on Iran tonight,… on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpWe always keep out two hoodies and two sets of fuzzy pajamas per person. We have a throw blanket for…
on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpI find that I’m much less extroverted now than I used to be... Kept granddaughter #3 on Wednesday wh…
on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpI'm skeptical of the reviews. It's solidly fresh on RT but even the good ones from the top critics s… on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching UpSo, having swapped out the flannel for linen, and broken out the summer clothes, how are you dealing…
Planning The Annual Trip Around The World
April 19, 2024
April 18, 2024
April 17, 2024
April 16, 2024
on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching Up on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching Up on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching Up on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
on Weekend Plans Post: The Aftermath of Catching Up
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024 on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
I do hope to get back to this, but I can’t at the moment. I’ll say for the moment that it was not Nozick’s intention to derive moral justifications for individual rights. He wanted instead to see what was left for the state, if we assume that individual rights (of some sort) should serve as constraints on our actions.
For arguments about where individual rights come from, I’d recommend David Conway’s Classical Liberalism: The Unvanquished Ideal, which takes a Kantian/deontological perspective on the question, one that I broadly share. There’s also my brief, incomplete explanation in handy blog post format.Report
Thanks, Jason.Report
Thanks for the link, Mark. I agree that Nozick wasn’t trying to justify rights in AS&U, but it does seem a bit like the elephant in the room as you’re reading it. The anarchist-minarchist debate, while interesting, is probably not a live issue for most people, yet Nozick spends a lot of time trying to justify the minimal state in the face of anarchist objections.
Interestingly, Nozick’s decision not to provide justification for rights is at least consistent with the general approach to philosophy that he espouses in Philosophical Explanations. He abjures “coercive” argumentation in favor of a more exploratory approach.Report