What a novel concept…
Senator Sanders, a tip-of-the-hat to you.
Dave
Dave is a part-time blogger that writes about whatever suits him at the time.
Features
Hot Posts
A Message From Devcat
We have been experiencing some system resource issues. We believe the problem may be resolved, but if it is not please bear with us.
Recent Comments
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024He should have blocked a bridge.
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024I guess i didn't communicate my point well -- nothing to do with conservatives, just saying that the…
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024I don't know that the bar is so much "higher" as "different," maybe even lower. Faculty have tenure…
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024According to Mr. Berliner, he kept trying to get management to do what he wanted. They didn't. Thus…on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024"Pitched a tantrum," of course, being the third-ideology conjugation of "spoke truth to power."
- on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024The Essay.
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024Soon to be the journalism dept. chair at the University of Austin.
- on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024Given his repeated statements about trying to raise this inside the house and being ignored, I read…
Comics
-
April 18, 2024
-
April 17, 2024
-
April 16, 2024
-
April 15, 2024
More Comments
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
on Open Mic for the week of 4/15/2024
- on The Statistical Side of Immigration
Whatever my thoughts about this proposal in theory and in concept (I like it), the amount of power this provides the Executive disturbs the living daylights out of me. This is something that requires a hell of a lot more than a one-paragraph definition if it were to have any kind of neutral application. Otherwise, the way this is currently worded, the Executive would have sole and absolute discretion (subject at best to an arbitrary and capricious standard of review) to say which businesses are and are not so big that they should be broken up.Report
I think I was more pleased with the principle than the actual legal language.
For some strange reason, every time I think of TBTF, I think of Fannie and Freddie ;). With the expectation of Uncle Sam stepping in, it’s not unreasonable to suggest they’d enjoy the same cost of capital advantages that Freddie and Fannie did.
Good points though.Report
Totally. It’s weird to me, sometimes, that the Dem/left-of-center Senators I tend to like the most are the ones that are the furthest left.Report
I had a chuckle thinking about that myself. I mean, me, Mr. Corporate Shill-Hate Unions-Screw Granny-Death Panel Lovin’ Libertarian agreeing with Bernie Sanders?
I mean…seriously…you’d think someone put a gun to my head. 😉Report
I’m for it. Needs to encode a better definition of “too big to fail” (eg, “cannot control more than X amount of Y financial industry), but other than that, good.Report
“Has donated at least $X to candidate’s re-election fund.”Report