no laughing matter
Christopher Hitchens takes a shot at Jon Stewart, Al Franken, and Stephen Colbert. Too much of his piece relies on cherry-picking, if you ask me.
by Erik Kain · September 14, 2009
Christopher Hitchens takes a shot at Jon Stewart, Al Franken, and Stephen Colbert. Too much of his piece relies on cherry-picking, if you ask me.
Erik Kain
Erik writes about video games at Forbes and politics at Mother Jones. He's the contributor of The League though he hasn't written much here lately. He can be found occasionally composing 140 character cultural analysis on Twitter.
October 31, 2016
March 10, 2013
July 13, 2014
Of Drag Queens and Michelangelo’s David
March 29, 2023
TSN Open Mic for the week of 3/20/2023
March 20, 2023
TSN Open Mic for the week of 3/13/2023
March 13, 2023
TSN Open Mic for the week of 3/6/2023
March 6, 2023
March 8, 2023
TSN Open Mic for the week of 3/27/2023
March 27, 2023
March 28, 2023
The site is running normal as far as we know. Please let us know of any problems.
I agree. He barely mentions Colbert and relies more on Jon’s writing than on actually watching episodes of “The Daily Show,” and even then more on “Naked Pictures of Famous People” than on “America.” It seems to me like he disagreed with Franken’s humor, and then lumped in Colbert and Stewart after minimal research in order to make it a “trend.” He should have stuck to Franken, at least he did his research there.Report
Yes – easily one of the worst Hitchens pieces I’ve read, and he has many, many pieces that I find hard to bear.Report